Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40395497›Full record

ArticleMechanobiology in medicine2024

From sequence to mechanobiology? Promises and challenges for AlphaFold 3.

Francesco Zonta, Sergio Pantano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Mechanobiology in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. AlphaFold3: An Overview of Applications and Performance Insights.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Harnessing mechanobiology to enhance cell therapy.Mechanobiology in medicine · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Francesco ZontaDepartment of Biological Sciences, School of Science, Xi'an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, Suzhou, China.
Sergio PantanoInstitut Pasteur de Montevideo, Montevideo, Uruguay.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interactions between macromolecules orchestrate many mechanobiology processes. However, progress in the field has often been hindered by the monetary and time costs of obtaining reliable experimental structures. In recent years, deep-learning methods, such as AlphaFold, have democratized access to high-quality predictions of the structural properties of proteins and other macromolecules. The newest implementation, AlphaFold 3, significantly expands the applications of its predecessor, AlphaFold 2, by incorporating reliable models for small molecules and nucleic acids and enhancing the prediction of macromolecular complexes. While several limitations still exist, the continuous improvement of machine learning methods like AlphaFold is producing a significant revolution in the field. The possibility of easily accessing structural predictions of biomolecular complexes may create substantial impacts in mechanobiology. Indeed, structural studies are at the basis of several applications in the field, such as drug discovery for mechanosensing proteins, development of mechanotherapy, understanding the mechanotransduction mechanisms and the mechanistic basis of diseases, or designing biomaterials for tissue engineering.

Indexed as

AlphaFoldBiological complexesDrug designProtein foldingStructure predictions

Identifiers

PMID40395497
PMCPMC12082301

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.