ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025
Evaluation of the reliability and validity of the Persian version of the Reported and Intended Behaviour Scale, a mental health stigma-related behaviour measure.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Several instruments have been developed to measure stigma associated with mental disorders. The Reported and Intended Behaviour Scale (RIBS) is one of the validated questionnaires to assess the presence of stigma and discrimination against people with mental illness in the general population. It consists of eight items, divided into two subscales that measure reported and intended stigmatizing behaviours. This study aimed to translate and validate the RIBS in Persian. Methods: We translated the RIBS questionnaire from English into Persian (RIBS-P) and back-translated it into English. Thereafter, ten psychiatrists evaluated its face validity. Between 2020 and 2021, 384 Persian-speaking adults (aged 18-60) residing in various cities across Iran, with internet access, participated in the study. Exploratory factor analyses were performed to determine the construct validity. The reliability of the questionnaire was assessed using internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha coefficient) and test-retest methods. Results: Most of the participants were 28-37 (53.9%), female (64.6%), married (51.6%), unemployed (67.7%) and educated (100%). The total Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the RIBS-P questionnaire was high (0.732) and The test-retest results showed no significant difference. Factor analysis was used for construct validity and resulted in the extraction of one factor, the mean, standard deviation, and Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the extracted factor were 3.25, 1.02 and 0.807. The items with the highest correlation with the extracted factor from the exploratory analysis were identified (>0.6). Age (0.00000010701), working status (0.00000010833), and education (0.00000010329) had a significant relationship with stigmatisation behaviour. Conclusion: The findings indicate that the Persian version of the RIBS is valid and reliable for assessing stigmatizing behaviours among Iranians.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.