ReviewMechanobiology in medicine2024
Advances in modeling cellular mechanical perceptions and responses via the membrane-cytoskeleton-nucleus machinery.
Review in Mechanobiology in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mechanical forces of beating heart suppress cancer growth.Mechanobiology in medicine · 2026Article
- PIEZO1-mediated mechanosensation links aging to bladder dysfunction.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Cadherin dynamics and cortical tension in remodeling cell-cell adhesion during EMT.Biophysical journal · 2025Article
- Estrogen attenuates stiffness-driven fibrotic signaling via transcriptional regulation.Biophysical journal · 2025Article
- Multidimensional excavation of the current status and trends of mechanobiology in cardiovascular homeostasis and remodeling within 20 years.Mechanobiology in medicine · 2025Review
- Mechanosensitive nuclear checkpoint: nuclear envelope as a sensor of chromosomal instability and driver of cell fate.Mechanobiology in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mechanical models offer a quantitative framework for understanding scientific problems, predicting novel phenomena, and guiding experimental designs. Over the past few decades, the emerging field of cellular mechanobiology has greatly benefited from the substantial contributions of new theoretical tools grounded in mechanical models. Within the expansive realm of mechanobiology, the investigation of how cells sense and respond to their microenvironment has become a prominent research focus. There is a growing acknowledgment that cells mechanically interact with their external surroundings through an integrated machinery encompassing the cell membrane, cytoskeleton, and nucleus. This review provides a comprehensive overview of mechanical models addressing three pivotal components crucial for force transmission within cells, extending from mechanosensitive receptors on the cell membrane to the actomyosin cytoskeleton and ultimately to the nucleus. We present the existing numerical relationships that form the basis for understanding the structures, mechanical properties, and functions of these components. Additionally, we underscore the significance of developing mechanical models in advancing cellular mechanobiology and propose potential directions for the evolution of these models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.