ArticleEuropean heart journal. Digital health2025
Siamese neural network-enhanced electrocardiography can re-identify anonymized healthcare data.
Article in European heart journal. Digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Computational modelling of biological systems now and then: revisiting tools and visions from the beginning of the century.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: Many research databases with anonymized patient data contain electrocardiograms (ECGs) from which traditional identifiers have been removed. We evaluated the ability of artificial intelligence (AI) methods to determine the similarity between ECGs and assessed whether they have the potential to be misused to re-identify individuals from anonymized datasets. Methods and results: We utilized a convolutional Siamese neural network (SNN) architecture, which derives a Euclidean distance similarity metric between two input ECGs. A secondary care dataset of 864 283 ECGs (72 455 subjects) was used. Siamese neural network-electrocardiogram (SNN-ECG) achieves an accuracy of 91.68% when classifying between 2 689 124 same-subject pairs and 2 689 124 different-subject pairs. This performance increases to 93.61% and 95.97% in outpatient and normal ECG subsets. In a simulated 'motivated intruder' test, SNN-ECG can identify individuals from large datasets. In datasets of 100, 1000, 10 000, and 20 000 ECGs, where only one ECG is also from the reference individual, it achieves success rates of 79.2%, 62.6%, 45.0%, and 40.0%, respectively. If this was random, the success would be 1%, 0.1%, 0.01%, and 0.005%, respectively. Additional basic information, like subject sex or age-range, enhances performance further. We also found that, on the subject level, ECG pair similarity is clinically relevant; greater ECG dissimilarity associates with all-cause mortality [hazard ratio, 1.22 (1.21-1.23), Conclusion: Anonymized ECGs retain information that may facilitate subject re-identification, raising privacy and data protection concerns. However, SNN-ECG models also have positive uses and can enhance risk prediction of cardiovascular disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.