Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40395429›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal. Digital health2025

Siamese neural network-enhanced electrocardiography can re-identify anonymized healthcare data.

Krzysztof Macierzanka, Arunashis Sau, Konstantinos Patlatzoglou, Libor Pastika, Ewa Sieliwonczyk, Mehak Gurnani, Nicholas S Peters, Jonathan W Waks, Daniel B Kramer, Fu Siong Ng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal. Digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Computational modelling of biological systems now and then: revisiting tools and visions from the beginning of the century.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Krzysztof MacierzankaNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, Du Cane Road, London W12 0NN, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9021-4334
Arunashis SauNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, Du Cane Road, London W12 0NN, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0204-7078
Konstantinos PatlatzoglouNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, Du Cane Road, London W12 0NN, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5888-8490
Libor PastikaNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, Du Cane Road, London W12 0NN, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6892-6553
Ewa SieliwonczykNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, Du Cane Road, London W12 0NN, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8603-7044
Mehak GurnaniNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, Du Cane Road, London W12 0NN, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-9228-2518
Nicholas S PetersNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, Du Cane Road, London W12 0NN, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3581-8078
Jonathan W WaksHarvard-Thorndike Electrophysiology Institute, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5560-5638
Daniel B KramerNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, Du Cane Road, London W12 0NN, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4241-3586
Fu Siong NgNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, Du Cane Road, London W12 0NN, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8681-4368

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims: Many research databases with anonymized patient data contain electrocardiograms (ECGs) from which traditional identifiers have been removed. We evaluated the ability of artificial intelligence (AI) methods to determine the similarity between ECGs and assessed whether they have the potential to be misused to re-identify individuals from anonymized datasets. Methods and results: We utilized a convolutional Siamese neural network (SNN) architecture, which derives a Euclidean distance similarity metric between two input ECGs. A secondary care dataset of 864 283 ECGs (72 455 subjects) was used. Siamese neural network-electrocardiogram (SNN-ECG) achieves an accuracy of 91.68% when classifying between 2 689 124 same-subject pairs and 2 689 124 different-subject pairs. This performance increases to 93.61% and 95.97% in outpatient and normal ECG subsets. In a simulated 'motivated intruder' test, SNN-ECG can identify individuals from large datasets. In datasets of 100, 1000, 10 000, and 20 000 ECGs, where only one ECG is also from the reference individual, it achieves success rates of 79.2%, 62.6%, 45.0%, and 40.0%, respectively. If this was random, the success would be 1%, 0.1%, 0.01%, and 0.005%, respectively. Additional basic information, like subject sex or age-range, enhances performance further. We also found that, on the subject level, ECG pair similarity is clinically relevant; greater ECG dissimilarity associates with all-cause mortality [hazard ratio, 1.22 (1.21-1.23), Conclusion: Anonymized ECGs retain information that may facilitate subject re-identification, raising privacy and data protection concerns. However, SNN-ECG models also have positive uses and can enhance risk prediction of cardiovascular disease.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceContinuous monitoringElectrocardiogramIdentificationSiamese neural network

Identifiers

PMID40395429
PMCPMC12088719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.