Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40395417›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal. Digital health2025

Deep learning on electrocardiogram waveforms to stratify risk of obstructive stable coronary artery disease.

Rishi K Trivedi, I Min Chiu, John Weston Hughes, Albert J Rogers, David Ouyang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal. Digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rishi K TrivediDepartment of Cardiology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Smidt Heart Institute, 127 S San Vicente Boulevard #A3600, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-9552-0491
I Min ChiuDepartment of Cardiology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Smidt Heart Institute, 127 S San Vicente Boulevard #A3600, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
John Weston HughesDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Albert J RogersDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
David OuyangDepartment of Cardiology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Smidt Heart Institute, 127 S San Vicente Boulevard #A3600, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3813-7518

Funding

Deep Learning Assessment of the Right Ventricle: Function, Etiology, and PrognosisR00HL157421 · NHLBI · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI OUYANG, DAVID · 2023 to 2025
$747k
Deep Learning Assessment of the Right Ventricle: Function, Etiology, and PrognosisK99HL157421 · NHLBI · CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER · PI OUYANG, DAVID · 2021 to 2022
$313k
NHLBI NIH HHS K99 HL157421NHLBI NIH HHS R00 HL157421
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims: Coronary artery disease (CAD) incidence continues to rise with an increasing burden of chronic coronary disease (CCD). Current probability-based risk assessment for obstructive CAD (oCAD) lacks sufficient diagnostic accuracy. We aimed to develop and validate a deep learning (DL) algorithm utilizing electrocardiogram (ECG) waveforms and clinical features to predict oCAD in patients with suspected CCD. Methods and results: The study includes subjects undergoing invasive angiography for evaluation of CCD over a 4-year period at a quaternary care centre. oCAD was defined as performance of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) based on assessment by interventional cardiologists during elective angiography. DL models were developed for ECG waveforms alone (DL-ECG), clinical features from standard risk scores (DL-Clinical), and the combination of ECG waveforms and clinical features (DL-MM); a commonly used pre-test probability estimation tool from the CAD Consortium study was used for comparison (CAD2) [3]. The CAD2 model [AUC 0.733 (0.717-0.750)] had similar performance as the DL-Clinical model [AUC 0.762 (0.746-0.778)]. The DL-ECG model [AUC 0.741 (0.726-0.758)] had similar performance as both the clinical feature models. The DL-MM model [AUC 0.807 (0.793-0.822)] had a superior performance. Validation in an external cohort demonstrated similar performance in the DL-MM [AUC 0.716 (0.707-0.726)] and CAD2 risk score [AUC 0.715 (0.705-0.724)]. Conclusion: A multi-modality DL model utilizing ECG waveforms and clinical risk factors can improve prediction of oCAD in CCD compared with risk-factor based models. Prospective research is warranted to determine whether incorporating DL methods in ECG analysis improves diagnosis of oCAD and outcomes in CCD.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceChronic coronary diseaseCoronary angiographyCoronary artery diseaseDeep learning

Identifiers

PMID40395417
PMCPMC12088713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.