ArticleEuropean heart journal. Digital health2025
Deep learning on electrocardiogram waveforms to stratify risk of obstructive stable coronary artery disease.
Article in European heart journal. Digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Comparing machine learning models and traditional approaches for predicting obstructive coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence-enabled electrocardiography for detection of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European heart journal. Digital health · 2026Review
- Diagnostic performance of the ECG-SMART AI score for detecting angiographically significant coronary artery disease in patients undergoing elective coronary angiography.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- Factors associated with physician modifications to automated ECG interpretations.European heart journal. Digital health · 2026Article
- Transforming Population Health Screening for Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease with AI-Enhanced ECG Analytics: Opportunities and Challenges.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2025Review
- Article
- ProtoECGNet: Case-Based Interpretable Deep Learning for Multi-Label ECG Classification with Contrastive Learning.Proceedings of machine learning research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Aims: Coronary artery disease (CAD) incidence continues to rise with an increasing burden of chronic coronary disease (CCD). Current probability-based risk assessment for obstructive CAD (oCAD) lacks sufficient diagnostic accuracy. We aimed to develop and validate a deep learning (DL) algorithm utilizing electrocardiogram (ECG) waveforms and clinical features to predict oCAD in patients with suspected CCD. Methods and results: The study includes subjects undergoing invasive angiography for evaluation of CCD over a 4-year period at a quaternary care centre. oCAD was defined as performance of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) based on assessment by interventional cardiologists during elective angiography. DL models were developed for ECG waveforms alone (DL-ECG), clinical features from standard risk scores (DL-Clinical), and the combination of ECG waveforms and clinical features (DL-MM); a commonly used pre-test probability estimation tool from the CAD Consortium study was used for comparison (CAD2) [3]. The CAD2 model [AUC 0.733 (0.717-0.750)] had similar performance as the DL-Clinical model [AUC 0.762 (0.746-0.778)]. The DL-ECG model [AUC 0.741 (0.726-0.758)] had similar performance as both the clinical feature models. The DL-MM model [AUC 0.807 (0.793-0.822)] had a superior performance. Validation in an external cohort demonstrated similar performance in the DL-MM [AUC 0.716 (0.707-0.726)] and CAD2 risk score [AUC 0.715 (0.705-0.724)]. Conclusion: A multi-modality DL model utilizing ECG waveforms and clinical risk factors can improve prediction of oCAD in CCD compared with risk-factor based models. Prospective research is warranted to determine whether incorporating DL methods in ECG analysis improves diagnosis of oCAD and outcomes in CCD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.