ArticleEuropean heart journal. Digital health2025
Identifying heart failure dynamics using multi-point electrocardiograms and deep learning.
Article in European heart journal. Digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Within a Heartbeat: A Machine Learning Approach Using VCG for Heart Failure Assessment in Sinus Rhythm.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Article
- Nonlinear association between visceral fat metabolism score and heart failure: insights from LightGBM modeling and SHAP-Driven feature interpretation in NHANES.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: Heart failure (HF) hospitalizations are associated with poor survival outcomes, emphasizing the need for early intervention. Deep learning algorithms have shown promise in HF detection through electrocardiogram (ECG). However, their utility in ongoing HF monitoring remains uncertain. This study developed a deep learning model using 12-lead ECGs collected at 2 different time points to evaluate HF status changes, aiming to enhance early intervention and continuous monitoring in various healthcare settings. Methods and results: We analysed 30 171 ECGs from 6531 adult patients at Kobe University Hospital. The participants were randomly assigned to training, validation, and test datasets. A Transformer-based model was developed to classify HF status into deteriorated, improved, and no-change classes based on ECG waveform signals at two different time points. Performance metrics, such as the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and accuracy, were calculated, and attention mapping via gradient-weighted class activation mapping was utilized to interpret the model's decision-making ability. The patients had an average age of 64.6 years (±15.4 years) and brain natriuretic peptide of 66.3 pg/mL (24.6-175.1 pg/mL). For HF status classification, the model achieved an AUROC of 0.889 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.879-0.898] and an accuracy of 0.871 (95% CI: 0.864-0.878). Conclusion: Transformer-based deep learning model demonstrated high accuracy in detecting HF status changes, highlighting its potential as a non-invasive, efficient tool for HF monitoring. The reliance of the model on ECGs reduces the need for invasive, costly diagnostics, aligning with clinical needs for accessible HF management. IRB Information: Kobe University Hospital Clinical & Translational Research Center (reference number: B220208).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.