Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40395412›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal. Digital health2025

Evaluating large language models in echocardiography reporting: opportunities and challenges.

Chieh-Ju Chao, Imon Banerjee, Reza Arsanjani, Chadi Ayoub, Andrew Tseng, Jean-Benoit Delbrouck, Garvan C Kane, Francisco Lopez-Jimenez, Zachi Attia, Jae K Oh and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal. Digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Generative AI models: the next anaesthetic agent?British journal of anaesthesia · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Chieh-Ju ChaoDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st Street SW, Room: Gonda 4-478, Rochester, MN 55095, USA.
Imon BanerjeeDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 13400 E Shea Blvd, Scottsdale, AZ 85259, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3327-8004
Reza ArsanjaniDepartment of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic Arizona, 13400 E Shea Blvd, Scottsdale, AZ 85259, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7081-4286
Chadi AyoubDepartment of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic Arizona, 13400 E Shea Blvd, Scottsdale, AZ 85259, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5877-7478
Andrew TsengDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic Florida, 4500 San Pablo Rd S, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9181-1970
Jean-Benoit DelbrouckCenter for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine and Imaging (AIMI), Stanford University, 1701 Page Mill Rd, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA.
Garvan C KaneDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st Street SW, Room: Gonda 4-478, Rochester, MN 55095, USA.
Francisco Lopez-JimenezDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st Street SW, Room: Gonda 4-478, Rochester, MN 55095, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5788-9734
Zachi AttiaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st Street SW, Room: Gonda 4-478, Rochester, MN 55095, USA.
Jae K OhDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st Street SW, Room: Gonda 4-478, Rochester, MN 55095, USA.
Bradley EricksonDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st Street SW, Rochester, MN 55095, USA.
Li Fei-FeiStanford Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence, 353 Jane Stanford Way, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Ehsan AdeliStanford Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence, 353 Jane Stanford Way, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Curtis LanglotzCenter for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine and Imaging (AIMI), Stanford University, 1701 Page Mill Rd, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims: The increasing need for diagnostic echocardiography tests presents challenges in preserving the quality and promptness of reports. While Large Language Models (LLMs) have proven effective in summarizing clinical texts, their application in echo remains underexplored. Methods and results: Adult echocardiography studies, conducted at the Mayo Clinic from 1 January 2017 to 31 December 2017, were categorized into two groups: development (all Mayo locations except Arizona) and Arizona validation sets. We adapted open-source LLMs (Llama-2, MedAlpaca, Zephyr, and Flan-T5) using In-Context Learning and Quantized Low-Rank Adaptation fine-tuning (FT) for echo report summarization from 'Findings' to 'Impressions.' Against cardiologist-generated Impressions, the models' performance was assessed both quantitatively with automatic metrics and qualitatively by cardiologists. The development dataset included 97 506 reports from 71 717 unique patients, predominantly male (55.4%), with an average age of 64.3 ± 15.8 years. EchoGPT, a fine-tuned Llama-2 model, outperformed other models with win rates ranging from 87% to 99% in various automatic metrics, and produced reports comparable to cardiologists in qualitative review (significantly preferred in conciseness ( Conclusion: EchoGPT can generate draft reports for human review and approval, helping to streamline the workflow. However, scalable evaluation approaches dedicated to echo reports remains necessary.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceCardiovascular ImagingEchocardiographyLarge Language ModelQuality

Identifiers

PMID40395412
PMCPMC12088711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.