ArticleFrontiers in robotics and AI2025
Enhancing needle puncture detection using high-pass filtering and diffuse reflectance.
Article in Frontiers in robotics and AI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Chest trauma or disease progression can lead to tension pneumothorax, a condition where mounting pressurization of the pleural cavity (the space between the chest wall and the lungs) leads rapidly to cardiac arrest. In pre-hospital settings, tension pneumothorax is treated by venting the pleural cavity via a needle introduced through the chest wall. Very high failure rates (up to 94.1%) have been reported for pre-hospital needle decompression, however, and the procedure can result in the accidental puncture of critical thoracic tissues because it is performed blind. Instrumented needles could help operators more reliably identify when the tool has entered the target space. Methods: This paper investigates technical approaches to provide such support; we created an experimental system that acquires needle force and position signals, as well as the diffuse backscattered reflectance from white light carried to and collected from the needle's tip via two in-bore optical fibers. Data collection occurred while two experimenters inserted a bevel-tipped percutaneous needle into an Results: Combining high-pass filters with DDPD methods resulted in a 2.7-fold improvement (from 8.2% to 21.9%) in the maximum overall precision (MOP) produced by force signals. Applying this HPF + DDPD scheme to reflectance data streams yielded a peak MOP of 36.4%, and combining reflectance with force generated the best MOP overall (42.1%); these results represent 4.4-fold and 5.1-fold improvements, respectively, over the best MOP produced by the traditional application of DDPD algorithms to force signals alone. Discussion: These results strongly support the utility of high-pass filters combined with both reflectance-only and multimodal reflectance-plus-force data-driven puncture-detection schemes for needle decompression applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.