SynthesisFrontiers in oncology2025
Impact of visceral obesity on postoperative outcomes in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Somatostatin in Aging: Correlations with Selected Central Nervous System and Gastrointestinal Tract Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Investigating the Prognostic Value of Pretreatment Body Composition in Women with Ovarian Cancer: Impact on Clinical Outcomes.Cancers · 2026Article
- Preoperative CT-derived liver fat fraction and visceral adipose tissue index enhance postoperative recurrence risk stratification in colorectal cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Body mass index-defined overweight (but not obese) correlates with better postoperative prognosis in colorectal cancer.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
- Predictors of Mortality in Surgical Patients Admitted to a Tertiary Intensive Care Unit.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the impact of visceral obesity (VO) on postoperative outcomes in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. Methods: Primary studies were obtained from sources like Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science during the search, which ran until October 2024. Patients with colorectal cancer who had visceral obesity (VO) and those who did not were compared in terms of intraoperative conditions, postoperative outcomes, postoperative complications, and long-term prognoses, including overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Results: 5,756 individuals with VO and 5,373 patients without VO were among the 11,129 patients who had colorectal cancer resected. Patients with VO had higher conversion rates (p = 0.03), fewer lymph nodes removed (p = 0.05), and longer recovery times for bowel movements (p = 0.009). Furthermore, patients with VO had a considerably greater overall incidence of sequelae than those without (p = 0.0003), including anastomotic leaks (p = 0.01), intestinal obstruction (p = 0.0003), intra-abdominal abscesses (p = 0.004), wound infections (p < 0.00001), and pulmonary problems (p = 0.0003). OS and DFS, however, did not differ between the two groups (p > 0.05). Conclusions: Colorectal cancer patients with VO who have surgery tend to have fewer lymph nodes taken, more problems after surgery, and a higher rate of switching to open surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.