Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40395285›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal. Imaging methods and practice2025

Machine learning-enabled screening for aortic stenosis with handheld ultrasound.

Samuel Karmiy, Zhe Huang, Divya Velury, Eileen Mai, Jing Li, Monica M Dehn, Dikran R Balian, Davinder Ramsingh, John Martin, Jacob Kantrowitz and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Samuel KarmiyDepartment of Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Zhe HuangDepartment of Computer Science, Tufts University, Medford, MA, USA.
Divya VeluryDepartment of Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Eileen MaiThe Cardiovascular Center, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Jing LiThe Cardiovascular Center, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Monica M DehnThe Cardiovascular Center, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Dikran R BalianTufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Davinder RamsinghButterfly Inc., Burlington, MA, USA.
John MartinButterfly Inc., Burlington, MA, USA.
Jacob KantrowitzDepartment of Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Ayan R PatelThe Cardiovascular Center, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Michael C HughesDepartment of Computer Science, Tufts University, Medford, MA, USA.
Benjamin S WesslerThe Cardiovascular Center, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8652-1426

Funding

Tufts Clinical and Translational Science Institute (Clinical Trial Design Labs Supplement)UM1TR004398 · NCATS · TUFTS UNIVERSITY BOSTON · PI Harry P. Selker · 2023 to 2026
$44.5M
Palliative Care for High-Risk TAVR Patients: The Impact of MultimorbidityK23AG055667 · NIA · TUFTS MEDICAL CENTER · PI WESSLER, BENJAMIN SETH · 2018 to 2022
$948k
NCATS NIH HHS UM1 TR004398NIA NIH HHS K23 AG055667
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims: Neural network classifiers can detect aortic stenosis (AS) using limited cardiac ultrasound images. While networks perform very well using cart-based imaging, they have never been tested or fine-tuned for use with focused cardiac ultrasound (FoCUS) acquisitions obtained on handheld ultrasound devices. Methods and results: Prospective study performed at Tufts Medical Center. All patients ≥65 years of age referred for clinically indicated transthoracic echocardigraphy (TTE) were eligible for inclusion. Parasternal long axis and parasternal short axis imaging was acquired using a commercially available handheld ultrasound device. Our cart-based AS classifier (trained on ∼10 000 images) was tested on FoCUS imaging from 160 patients. The median age was 74 (inter-quartile range 69-80) years, 50% of patients were women. Thirty patients (18.8%) had some degree of AS. The area under the received operator curve (AUROC) of the cart-based model for detecting AS was 0.87 (95% CI 0.75-0.99) on the FoCUS test set. Last-layer fine-tuning on handheld data established a classifier with AUROC of 0.94 (0.91-0.97). AUROC during temporal external validation was 0.97 (95% CI 0.89-1.0). When performance of the fine-tuned AS classifier was modelled on potential screening environments (2 and 10% AS prevalence), the positive predictive value ranged from 0.72 (0.69-0.76) to 0.88 (0.81-0.97) and negative predictive value ranged from 0.94 (0.94-0.94) to 0.99 (0.99-0.99) respectively. Conclusion: Our cart-based machine-learning model for AS showed a drop in performance when tested on handheld ultrasound imaging collected by sonographers. Fine-tuning the AS classifier improved performance and demonstrates potential as a novel approach to detecting AS through automated interpretation of handheld imaging.

Indexed as

aortic stenosisdiagnosisechocardiographymachine learning

Identifiers

PMID40395285
PMCPMC12089772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.