Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40395271›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Assessing the Impact of a Prescription Communication Skills Training Module on the Attitudes and Competency of Medical Undergraduates.

Padmanabha Thiruganahalli Shivaraju, Ravi Shankar Manchukonda, Tejaswi H Lokanathan, Haradanahalli G Kshamaa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Padmanabha Thiruganahalli ShivarajuPharmacology, Adichunchanagiri Institute of Medical Sciences, Adichunchanagiri University, BG Nagara, IND.
Ravi Shankar ManchukondaPharmacology, Adichunchanagiri Institute of Medical Sciences, Adichunchanagiri University, BG Nagara, IND.
Tejaswi H LokanathanAnatomy, Adichunchanagiri Institute of Medical Sciences, Adichunchanagiri University, BG Nagara, IND.
Haradanahalli G KshamaaPsychiatry, Kempegowda Institute of Medical Sciences, Bengaluru, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionGood doctor-patient communication is critical in enhancing treatment adherence. Ineffective doctor communication has been associated with high patient non-adherence, while good communication improves doctor-patient relationships and improves adherence. Communication skills have been identified by the National Medical Commission as one of the important competencies for Indian medical graduates. Ineffective communication of prescriptions is still a challenge, impacting patient outcomes. Incorporating a communication skills module as per Competency-Based Medical Education (CBME) guidelines can increase the confidence and competence of medical students in communicating prescriptions to eventually improve patient care.

methodsThis interventional mixed-method study assessed the impact of prescription communication training module in 145 second-phase MBBS students after obtaining ethical clearance. The communication skills module was first introduced to the students through a sensitization session. Questionnaire on communication skills was administered to measure baseline attitudes toward communication skills. Intervention included structured training module comprised of four sessions, each of two-hour duration with role-play. Upon completion of the sessions, a post-test utilizing the same questionnaire on attitudes was administered to measure differences in communication skills attitudes. The main outcome was assessed by change in scores of communication skills before and after the module training using objective structured practical examination (OSPE). Students' reactions towards the training module were recorded. Data were analyzed for statistical significance using t-test.

resultsThe post-test was taken by 124 (85.52% response rate) out of 145 medical students in second phase. Positive attitude scores in the post-intervention phase were more favorable in male students, rural-background students, and doctor-families, whereas negative attitude scores were negatively affected in males and urban-background students. Student performance above 6.5 scores improved from 47.58% (n = 59) to 57.26% (n = 71) after intervention, which was statistically significant (p value < 0.001). Ability to communicate rated as "very good" improved to 9.68% (n =12) from 5.34% (n =7). 87% (n = 34) of the males and 100% (n = 86) of the females concurred that training done regularly would enhance their performance.

conclusionStudents' performance and self-confidence in prescription communication skills improved as a result of the four-week training program. However, there was no appreciable shift in attitudes. Inclusion of such modules in healthcare education would make prescription communication competent and confident for students. Additional studies are needed to determine its actual effect in real-life practice on patient communication.

Indexed as

assessmentattitudescommunication modulecommunication skills attitude scalecompetencyconfidenceinterventionprescription communication skillsself-evaluationtraining

Identifiers

PMID40395271
PMCPMC12089674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.