ArticleCureus2025
Cancer on Hold, Infections on the Rise: The Unseen Pandemic Effect on Thoracic Surgery in the Developing World.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted global healthcare systems, leading to major shifts in surgical case prioritization. This study examines how thoracic surgical trends changed at a tertiary care hospital in Peshawar, Pakistan, specifically comparing oncologic and non-oncologic procedures, patient demographics, and surgical outcomes. Methods We conducted a retrospective comparative study of major thoracic surgeries performed between December 2018 and July 2021. The study period was divided into pre-pandemic (December 2018-March 2020) and pandemic (April 2020-July 2021) phases. Surgical records were reviewed to assess changes in oncologic and non-oncologic surgical indications, patient characteristics, and outcomes. Univariate analyses were conducted to compare the pre-pandemic and pandemic groups for baseline characteristics, indications, and procedures. Multivariable analyses identified the independent association of the pandemic with oncologic procedures. Data analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 25 (Released 2017; IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, United States). Results A total of 246 thoracic surgeries were analyzed. Oncologic surgeries significantly declined from 36 (41.4%) pre-pandemic to 34 (21.4%) during the pandemic (p=0.001), with esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma decreasing from 16 (18.4%) to 9 (5.7%) (p<0.002) and lobectomy for lung cancer dropping from six (6.9%) to one (0.6%) (p=0.018). Meanwhile, non-oncologic surgeries increased significantly from 51 (58.6%) to 125 (78.6%) during the pandemic (p<0.001). The most notable increases were in decortication for empyema thoracis, from 21 (24.1%) to 55 (34.6%), p=0.006, and emergency thoracotomy, from two (2.3%) to 11 (6.9%), p=0.034. Hydatid cystectomy remained stable from 11 (12.6%) to 17 (10.7%), p=0.722. While baseline patient characteristics remained similar, thoracic surgeries were performed more frequently in males and children under 10 years old (p=0.042) during the pandemic. Despite the increased volume, postoperative complications (p=0.39) and mortality rates (p=0.553) remained unchanged. Conclusion The COVID-19 pandemic significantly altered thoracic surgical trends, shifting the focus from oncologic to non-oncologic cases, particularly infectious and emergency conditions. The decline in cancer surgeries reflects disruptions in oncologic care, while the rise in empyema thoracis highlights increased infectious disease burden and late-stage presentations. These findings emphasize the need for strategies that ensure continued oncologic care while responding to emergent thoracic conditions during global health crises.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.