Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40395221›Full record

ReviewMechanobiology in medicine2024

Viscoelasticity of ECM and cells-origin, measurement and correlation.

Zhiqiang Liu, Si Da Ling, Kaini Liang, Yihan Chen, Yudi Niu, Lei Sun, Junyang Li, Yanan Du

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Mechanobiology in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Biophysics of lumen morphogenesis.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Zhiqiang LiuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, Tsinghua-Peking Center for Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.
Si Da LingDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, Tsinghua-Peking Center for Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.
Kaini LiangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, Tsinghua-Peking Center for Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.
Yihan ChenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, Tsinghua-Peking Center for Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.
Yudi NiuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, Tsinghua-Peking Center for Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.
Lei SunDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, Tsinghua-Peking Center for Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.
Junyang LiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, Tsinghua-Peking Center for Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.
Yanan DuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, Tsinghua-Peking Center for Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The extracellular matrix (ECM) and cells are crucial components of natural tissue microenvironments, and they both demonstrate dynamic mechanical properties, particularly viscoelastic behaviors, when exposed to external stress or strain over time. The capacity to modify the mechanical properties of cells and ECM is crucial for gaining insight into the development, physiology, and pathophysiology of living organisms. As an illustration, researchers have developed hydrogels with diverse compositions to mimic the properties of the native ECM and use them as substrates for cell culture. The behavior of cultured cells can be regulated by modifying the viscoelasticity of hydrogels. Moreover, there is widespread interest across disciplines in accurately measuring the mechanical properties of cells and the surrounding ECM, as well as exploring the interactive relationship between these components. Nevertheless, the lack of standardized experimental methods, conditions, and other variables has hindered systematic comparisons and summaries of research findings on ECM and cell viscoelasticity. In this review, we delve into the origins of ECM and cell viscoelasticity, examine recently developed methods for measuring ECM and cell viscoelasticity, and summarize the potential interactions between cell and ECM viscoelasticity. Recent research has shown that both ECM and cell viscoelasticity experience alterations during in vivo pathogenesis, indicating the potential use of tailored viscoelastic ECM and cells in regenerative medicine.

Indexed as

CellCorrelationExtracellular matrixMeasurementOriginViscoelasticity

Identifiers

PMID40395221
PMCPMC12082326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.