Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40395099›Full record

ReviewTurkish journal of ophthalmology2025

Binocular Approaches in Amblyopia Treatment Based on Dichoptic Stimulation

Demet Yabanoğlu, Hande Taylan Şekeroğlu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Turkish journal of ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Recent advances in strabismus.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Demet YabanoğluHacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, Ankara, TürkiyeORCID 0000-0003-4532-3543
Hande Taylan ŞekeroğluHacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, Ankara, TürkiyeORCID 0000-0002-4783-522X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The discovery that binocular dysfunction may play a critical role in the development of amblyopia has led to the development of a novel approach based on contrast-rebalanced binocular stimulation of both eyes. This approach, known as dichoptic stimulation, enables the treatment of amblyopia by facilitating the cooperation of both eyes. Dichoptic treatment approaches are founded on the theoretical premise that binocular imbalance plays a significant role in both monocular and binocular impairments in amblyopia, and that preserving binocular function capacity is essential. Therefore, these approaches are designed to promote the collaborative functioning of the eyes, enhance stereopsis, and improve binocular fusion. This review systematically examines and synthesizes the existing literature on dichoptic stimulation techniques aimed at improving binocular function in the treatment of amblyopia. Based on various studies in the literature, the fundamental principles of these treatment methods are outlined, and the results obtained in comparison to traditional monocular treatments are highlighted. The clinical efficacy of dichoptic treatment methods is evaluated in terms of their contribution to enhancing binocular function in amblyopia. Additionally, information is provided regarding the outcomes, treatment durations, efficacy levels, and potential side effects of these treatment approaches in different patient groups. This review offers a comprehensive assessment of the integration of dichoptic treatment approaches into clinical practice, highlighting both their advantages and disadvantages, and aims to provide a guiding perspective on their future use.

Indexed as

AmblyopiaVision, BinocularVisual AcuityHumansAmblyopiabinocular dysfunctionbinocular therapies of amblyopiadichoptic stimulation

Identifiers

PMID40395099
PMCPMC12192222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.