Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40394740›Full record

ArticleSe pu = Chinese journal of chromatography2025

[Research progress in material preparation and application of magnetism-enhanced in-tube solid-phase microextraction].

Ya-Na Luo, Jia Chen, Yu-Yu Hu, Shi-Jie Gao, Yan-Li Wang, Yan-Ming Liu, Juan-Juan Feng, Min Sun

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Se pu = Chinese journal of chromatography, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ya-Na LuoSchool of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering,University of Jinan,Jinan 250022,China.
Jia ChenSchool of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering,University of Jinan,Jinan 250022,China.
Yu-Yu HuSchool of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering,University of Jinan,Jinan 250022,China.
Shi-Jie GaoSchool of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering,University of Jinan,Jinan 250022,China.
Yan-Li WangShandong Institute for Food and Drug Control,Shandong Research Center of Engineering and Technology for Safety Inspection of Food and Drug,Jinan 250101,China.
Yan-Ming LiuShandong Institute for Food and Drug Control,Shandong Research Center of Engineering and Technology for Safety Inspection of Food and Drug,Jinan 250101,China.
Juan-Juan FengSchool of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering,University of Jinan,Jinan 250022,China.
Min SunSchool of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering,University of Jinan,Jinan 250022,China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Selecting a suitable sample preparation method is a significant step prior to chromatographic separation and detection. Directly analyzing samples instrumentally is difficult owing to the complexity of the sample matrix and the trace concentration of analytes. Most sample preparation methods have disadvantages, including complicated operating procedures, the use of large amounts of organic solvent, and ease of analyte loss during multistep processes; consequently, they do not meet the high analytical sample detection requirements of modern industry. The development of simple, environmentally friendly, efficient, and rapid preparation methods is a continuing frontier research area in the analytical chemistry field. Among the many available sample preparation techniques, in-tube solid-phase microextraction (IT-SPME) is receiving extensive attention. IT-SPME enriches the target analytes by extracting them to the inner surface of the capillary tube, and has been applied to extract various analytes in the environmental and food fields. IT-SPME is advantageous because it consumes low amounts of organic solvent and capillaries are mechanical stable; consequently, IT-SPME is a promising sample preparation technique. Magnetic field has been introduced to the IT-SPME system to further improve extraction efficiency and selectivity, leading to the development of magnetism-enhanced in-tube solid-phase microextraction (ME-IT-SPME) as a new technology. ME-IT-SPME uses magnetic field to separate and enrich targets, with different magnetic-field strengths applied to the extraction column during adsorption and elution. Diamagnetic substances in a paramagnetic medium tend to concentrate in regions where the magnetic field is weak when an external magnetic field is applied. Target analytes are detected chromatographically following elution. Conditions are optimized and an analytical method is established and used to detect targets in actual samples, leading to improved extraction sensitivity and precision compared to those obtained using IT-SPME, including shorter analysis time and superior extraction efficiency. This paper reviews the applications of ME-IT-SPME technology in combination with various analytical instruments since its inception in 2012, and analyzes its analysis and detection advantages. Based on hydrophobic interactions, hydrogen bonding,

Indexed as

biomedicine analysisenvironmental analysisfood analysismagnetism-enhanced in-tube solid-phase microextraction (ME-IT-SPME)reviewsample preparation

Identifiers

PMID40394740
PMCPMC12093209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.