ArticleNeurological research and practice2025
Long-term outcomes of community-based intensive care treatment following neurological early rehabilitation- results of a multicentric German study.
Article in Neurological research and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
29 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWeaning from mechanical ventilation (MV) and tracheal cannula (TC) during neurological early rehabilitation (NER) is mostly successful. However, some patients leave NER with TC/MV, requiring home-based specialized intensive care nursing (HSICN). Data on medical and demographic characteristics and long-term outcomes of these patients are limited.
methodsA multicentric retrospective observational study across five German NER hospitals collected data from neurological patients with TC/MV at discharge. The study aimed to assess patients' health status at NER discharge, and to identify predictors of post-discharge survival. Survival rates were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates; further predictors of survival post-discharge were analyzed using Cox regression.
resultsAmong 312 patients, the one-year survival rate was 61.9%, decreasing to 38.1% after approximately 4 years. Older age, higher overall morbidity and discharge with MV were associated with an increased likelihood of death, while a longer stay in NER correlated with survival.
conclusionsPatients requiring HSICN after discharge from NER have a high mortality rate. Identifying survival predictors may help to identify patients at risk, and thus could be integrated into the decision-making process for NER discharge. The high mortality post-discharge warrants an evaluation of the current post-hospital care model. Optimizing therapeutic care in the HSICN setting may have the potential to reduce mortality and neuro-disability, and enhance the quality of life in these neurologically severely affected patients.
trial registrationThe trial OptiNIV - Retrospective study of post-hospital intensive care in neurological patients has been retrospectively registered in the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS) since 28.10.2022 with the ID DRKS00030580.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.