ArticlePhilosophy, ethics, and humanities in medicine : PEHM2025
Ethics in aesthetic practice: results from a survey of medical doctors attending aesthetic medicine programs in Italy.
Article in Philosophy, ethics, and humanities in medicine : PEHM, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWithin a rapidly evolving digital age in which social media plays a key role, the number of aesthetic medicine procedures performed globally is increasing.
methodsPhysicians who participated in training courses in aesthetic medicine in Italy run by two different medical societies SIME (International School of Aesthetic Medicine Carlo Alberto Bartoletti Foundation) and Agorà (Post-Graduate School of Aesthetic Medicine Agorà), completed a survey (November 2023 - January 2024) to assess their viewpoints on ethics in aesthetic medicine and findings combined.
resultsOf 452 physicians, 72.6% - 88.2% strongly agreed about the importance of maintaining up-to-date aesthetic medicine knowledge, protecting patient confidentiality, appropriate patient communication, prioritizing patient care and safety, respecting patient dignity and privacy, and obtaining informed consent. Around half of the respondents strongly agreed with correlations between social media (including the use of filters, idealized photos, and the constant sharing of content for personalized feedback) and psychological dysfunctions/body dissatisfaction, and that physicians should examine patients with highly filtered photographs for warning signs and unrealistic expectations. Approximately 15.4% - 55.0% strongly agreed with the importance of focusing on the patient's best interest, not performing procedures on those with unrealistic expectations, letting patients decide who to involve in consultations, education in key ethical principles in aesthetic medicine (including patient autonomy and self-determination), submitting experimental aesthetic procedures to a territorial ethics committee, and obtaining informed consent from adolescents for their procedures (as well as their parents/caregivers). 43.0% - 52.0% strongly disagreed that it was unnecessary to communicate all treatment information to patients, hear and respect patient opinions, or involve patients in decisions. One-third of respondents reported previously encountering ethical issues for treatment.
conclusionIn a survey of physicians focused on ethics in aesthetic medicine, most strongly agreed with key ethical principles in aesthetic medicine; however, more formal education/training was required to highlight the importance of patient autonomy and self-determination principles, involving patients in decisions, focusing on the patient's best interest, hearing/respecting patient opinion, avoiding procedures on those with unrealistic expectations, communicating all treatment aspects to patients, letting patients decide who to involve in consultations, and understanding the negative impact of social media on patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.