ArticleEuropean journal of medical research2025
Growth and size of stem cells from human exfoliated deciduous teeth cultured in platelet lysate vs. fetal bovine serum for regenerative applications.
Article in European journal of medical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Platelet Lysate-Based Biomaterials for Regenerative Tissue Engineering: A Comprehensive Review.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundStem cells from human exfoliated deciduous teeth (SHED) can differentiate into functioning neurons and oligodendrocytes and exhibit immunomodulatory and regenerative properties. This study aimed to compare the growth and size of SHED cultured in human platelet lysate (hPL) and fetal bovine serum (FBS), with the goal of evaluating their potential use in regenerative medicine.
methodsHealthy deciduous teeth with uninflamed pulp were used for culture. Growth, proliferation, and morphology of the cultured SHED, as well as the mean surface area, length, and width of the cells, were compared between FBS and hPL.
resultsThe mean surface area of the cultured SHED was lower on FBS than on hPL on days 4, 6, and 9 of passage 0, higher on FBS on day 2, and comparable on days 5 and 10. Comparison of growth, proliferation, and morphology of the cultured SHED on FBS and hPL on days 3 and 9 of passage 0 showed no significant difference. In addition, there was no significant difference regarding growth, proliferation, and morphology of the cells between FBS and hPL on the same days of passages 1, 2, 3, and 4. The total mean length of the cells was lower on hPL than on FBS within 10 days (137.9 vs. 148.1 µm), while the total mean width of the cells was higher on hPL than on FBS within 10 days (28 vs. 26 µm).
conclusionsFBS and hPL were comparable regarding growth, proliferation, and morphology of SHED, with higher mean width and lower mean length on hPL than on FBS within 10 days and overall comparable mean surface area after 10 days of passage 0. Therefore, FBS and hPL appear to be relatively similar for the culture of SHED, and hPL can replace FBS for this purpose.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.