ArticleBMC medical ethics2025
"It is difficult to be absolutely sure one way or the other." - a mixed method study on Finnish physicians' views on euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide.
Article in BMC medical ethics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Physicians' Attitudes Toward Euthanasia in Türkiye: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Ethical Heterogeneity and Decision-Making Patterns.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEuthanasia and physician-assisted suicide (PAS) are complex and ethically challenging topics. Physicians' attitudes toward euthanasia and PAS have been studied, but little is known about their ethical considerations regarding these topics. This study aimed to assess Finnish physicians' views on assisted dying (AD), including euthanasia and PAS. Our special emphasis was to describe physicians' views on the legalization of AD, their views on AD as a phenomenon, and how AD reflects on physicians' roles.
methodsA survey including statements and open questions concerning euthanasia and PAS was sent to all Finnish physicians in 2020. The data was analysed using quantitative measures and a qualitative approach.
resultsAltogether, 6889 physicians answered the survey, yielding a response rate of 26%. Of the responders, 9% fully agreed that accepting euthanasia would benefit the physician-patient relationship, while 19% fully agreed that it would harm this relationship. From 2565 responders, 3033 answers were received to the open questions. The qualitative analysis yielded two unifying categories, firstly 'Physicians' views on assisted dying (AD) in the current societal situation and on its legalization' included three main categories namely: 'AD and end-of-life issues in the current societal situation' (f = 230), 'Physicians perspectives on legalisation of AD' (f = 605) and 'The possible consequences of legalizing AD' (f = 543). Secondly, the unifying category 'Physicians views on AD as part of their work and as a phenomenon' included two main categories, 'AD and the physicians' professional role (f = 650) and 'AD as a multifaceted phenomenon' (f = 296).
conclusionAssisted dying is seen as a complex issue, and it was difficult to form an opinion on it. Physicians and the care team are faced with ethical dilemmas about topics related to AD, even though it is not legalized in Finland. Open and pluralistic discussion on AD, including ethical aspects, implications for society and end-of-life care practices is of utmost importance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.