Trial reportRespiratory research2025
Lung lipids associated with smoking and ECIG use in a cross-sectional study and clinical trial.
Trial report in Respiratory research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02596685 (Effects of Electronic Cigarette Use on the Human Lung), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effects of Electronic Cigarette Use on the Human Lung
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Investigating the exhaled lipid biomarkers among e-cigarette users compared to non-smokers.Lipids in health and disease · 2026Article
- The Impact of Cigarette Smoking, Waterpipe Smoking, and E-Cigarette Vaping on Peri-Implant Clinical Outcomes and Inflammatory Markers: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of oral & maxillofacial researchReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWhile electronic cigarettes (ECIG) may have lower toxicant delivery than cigarettes, ECIG-liquids and aerosols still contain toxicants that can potentially disrupt lung lipid homeostasis.
methodsParticipants from two studies underwent bronchoscopy and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL). Ninety-eight participants (21-44 years old) were included in a cross-sectional study, with 17 ECIG users, 52 non-smokers, and 29 smokers. In the four-week clinical trial, 30 non-smokers were randomly assigned to use nicotine-free, flavorless ECIG or no use. A panel of 75 quantifiable lipid species and 7 lipid classes were assessed in the BAL using two tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) platforms. Ten cytokines and lipid-laden macrophages (LLM) were analyzed using the V-PLEX Plus Proinflam Combo 10 panel and Oil Red O staining, respectively.
resultsIn the cross-sectional study, 43 lipids were associated with smoking status at FDR<0.1, including two between ECIG and non-smokers (PC(14:0/18:1) and PC(18:0/14:0)) in pairwise follow-up analyses (Bonferroni-adjusted p<0.017). Associations between lipid species and cotinine, inflammatory markers, including IL-1β and IL-8, and LLM were also identified, as well as differences in lipid classes between smokers and the other groups. Smokers had higher saturated lipids, including ceramide (CER), sphingomyelin (SM), and diacylglycerol (DAG) than that of non-smokers and ECIG users. No significant associations were identified in the 4-week clinical trial.
conclusionsSmoking was associated with altered lipid levels, as compared to both non-smokers and ECIG users; the majority were downregulated and ECIG effects tend to be smaller in magnitude than smoking effects, although some were different than those in the smokers group. This is a novel study of healthy individuals examining lipidomic differences between smokers, ECIG users, and non-smokers, indicating potential roles of smoking and ECIG-related lipid alterations in pulmonary disease.
trial registrationThe study was approved by The OSU Institutional Review Board (OSU-2015C0088) in accordance with its ethical standards, the Helsinki declaration, and the Belmont Report, and is registered on Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02596685; 2015-11-04).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.