Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40394616›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research : BCR2025

Quantifying tumor morphological complexity based on pretreatment MRI fractal analysis for predicting pathologic complete response and survival in breast cancer: a retrospective, multicenter study.

Yao Huang, Ying Cao, Huifang Chen, Xiaosong Lan, Sun Tang, Zhitao Zhang, Ting Yin, Xiaoxia Wang, Jiuquan Zhang

Abstract readMulticenter StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yao HuangSchool of Medicine, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China.
Ying CaoSchool of Medicine, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China.
Huifang ChenDepartment of Radiology, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing Key Laboratory for Intelligent Oncology in Breast Cancer (iCQBC), Chongqing, 400030, China.
Xiaosong LanDepartment of Radiology, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing Key Laboratory for Intelligent Oncology in Breast Cancer (iCQBC), Chongqing, 400030, China.
Sun TangDepartment of Radiology, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing Key Laboratory for Intelligent Oncology in Breast Cancer (iCQBC), Chongqing, 400030, China.
Zhitao ZhangSiemens Healthineers Digital Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China.
Ting YinMR Collaborations, Siemens Healthineers Ltd., Chengdu, China.
Xiaoxia WangDepartment of Radiology, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing Key Laboratory for Intelligent Oncology in Breast Cancer (iCQBC), Chongqing, 400030, China. wangxx0531@foxmail.com.
Jiuquan ZhangDepartment of Radiology, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing Key Laboratory for Intelligent Oncology in Breast Cancer (iCQBC), Chongqing, 400030, China. zhangjq_radiol@foxmail.com.

Funding

Chongqing Medical Research Project of Combination of Science and Medicine No. 2024MSXM171Chongqing University Cancer Hospital Scientific Research Capacity Improvement Project 2023nlts004Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities 2023CDJYGRH-YB04Graduate Research and Innovation Foundation of Chongqing CYB23070Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing municipality CSTB2023NSCQ-MSX0787
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe tumor morphological complexity is closely associated with treatment response and prognosis in patients with breast cancer. However, conveniently quantifiable tumor morphological complexity methods are currently lacking.

methodsWomen with breast cancer who underwent NAC and pretreatment MRI were retrospectively enrolled at four centers from May 2010 to April 2023. MRI-based fractal analysis was used to calculate fractal dimensions (FDs), quantifying tumor morphological complexity. Features associated with pCR were identified using multivariable logistic regression analysis, upon which a nomogram model was developed, and assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Cox proportional hazards analysis was used to identify independent prognostic factors for disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) and develop nomogram models.

resultsA total of 1109 patients (median age, 49 years [IQR, 43-54 years]) were included. The training, external validation cohort 1, and cohort 2 included 435, 351, and 323 patients, respectively. HR status (odds ratio [OR], 0.234 [0.135, 0.406]; P < 0.001), HER2 status (OR, 3.320 [1.923, 5.729]; P < 0.001), and Global FD (OR, 0.352 [0.261, 0.480]; P < 0.001) were independent predictors of pCR. The nomogram model for predicting pCR achieved AUCs of 0.80 (95% CI: 0.75, 0.86) and 0.74 (95% CI: 0.68, 0.79) in the external validation cohorts. The nomogram model, which integrated global FD and clinicopathological variables can stratify prognosis into low-risk and high-risk groups (log-rank test, DFS: P = 0.04; OS: P < 0.001).

conclusionsGlobal FD can quantify tumor morphological complexity and the model that combines global FD and clinicopathological variables showed good performance in predicting pCR to NAC and survival in patients with breast cancer.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsFractalsMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdultFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyNomogramsPathologic Complete ResponsePrognosisRetrospective StudiesROC CurveBreast cancerMRINeoadjuvant chemotherapyPathological complete response

Identifiers

PMID40394616
PMCPMC12090479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.