ArticleBMC women's health2025
The preferences of breast cancer patients regarding a digital social care platform.
Article in BMC women's health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- "…it is not the sickness itself that kills. It is the emotional trauma": a qualitative study of the lived experience and systemic barriers of women with breast cancer in Nigeria.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBreast cancer is a multifaceted condition affecting women globally, with patients often facing emotional, psychological, and social challenges. This study explored breast cancer patients' preferences for features of a digital social care platform.
methodsA cross-sectional study using Conjoint Analysis (CA), grounded in economic utility theory, was conducted. A Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE) questionnaire was administered to 158 breast cancer patients at a university hospital in Iran between November 2023 and January 2024. Data were analysed using ordered logistic regression in Stata 13.
resultsAll platform attributes significantly influenced preferences (P ≤ 0.05). Emotional support had the highest impact (β = 1.132), followed by informational (β = 0.973) and esteem support (β = 0.864). Instructional videos increased the likelihood of choosing a digital platform 2.45 times compared to text-based messages (P < 0.001). Personalized online support was 1.42 times more preferred than generic supportive messages (P < 0.001). Mindfulness affirmations were 1.14 times more preferred than inspirational messages (P < 0.001).
conclusionDigital tools that prioritize emotional, informational, and esteem support-especially through personalized online support and instructional videos can improve patient engagement and acceptability. These findings support the patient-centred design of digital social care platforms to enhance quality of life for breast cancer patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.