ArticleBMC health services research2025
Sex differences in healthcare utilization for chronic rhinosinusitis: a prospective cohort study.
Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAn understanding of future healthcare needs of patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is essential for patients and providers to make informed treatment decisions. Data on the predictors of long-term CRS-related healthcare utilization are limited. While there is evidence of sex differences in CRS, it is unknown whether the factors associated with long-term healthcare needs differ by sex.
objectiveThe objectives of this study were to evaluate associations between CRS symptoms and CRS-related healthcare utilization and how these associations differ by sex.
methodsWe conducted a prospective study of 7,847 subjects, utilizing questionnaire and electronic health record data to assess CRS-related healthcare utilization. Individuals who met CRS symptom criteria were categorized into one of four symptom profiles in 2014: obstruction and discharge; pain or pressure without smell loss; smell loss without pain or pressure; and pain or pressure and smell loss. Healthcare utilization (2014-2019) was classified into one of six categories based on CRS-related clinical encounters and diagnostic imaging: minimal overall utilization, no CRS-related utilization; one-year of CRS-related utilization; repeated CRS-related utilization; episodic CRS-related utilization; and discontinued utilization. We evaluated associations between symptom profiles and utilization categories using multinomial logistic regression to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI), assessing effect modification by sex using cross-product terms.
resultsOf the 7,847 subjects, 62.7% were women and 37.3% were men. Among women, there was no association between CRS symptoms in 2014 and repeated CRS-related healthcare utilization (versus discontinued CRS-related utilization), whereas men with CRS symptoms had nearly twice the odds (OR 1.81 CI: 1.02, 3.20) of repeated utilization. Women who had CRS with pain and pressure, had higher odds of discontinued CRS-related utilization. This was not observed for other symptom profiles.
conclusionHealthcare utilization patterns for CRS varied by symptoms and sex. Women with facial pain/pressure were uniquely at risk for discontinuation of CRS-related care, providing further evidence of sex differences among individuals reporting sinonasal symptoms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.