ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2025
Advanced feature fusion of radiomics and deep learning for accurate detection of wrist fractures on X-ray images.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine Learning for Revision Joint Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review of Distinct Challenges, Current Performance, and Clinical Readiness.Arthroplasty today · 2026Article
- PEYOLO: a wrist fracture detection network based on multi-level receptive field feature extraction and cross-scale fusion.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe aim of this study was to develop a hybrid diagnostic framework integrating radiomic and deep features for accurate and reproducible detection and classification of wrist fractures using X-ray images. MATERIALS AND
methodsA total of 3,537 X-ray images, including 1,871 fracture and 1,666 non-fracture cases, were collected from three healthcare centers. Radiomic features were extracted using the PyRadiomics library, and deep features were derived from the bottleneck layer of an autoencoder. Both feature modalities underwent reliability assessment via Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) and cosine similarity. Feature selection methods, including ANOVA, Mutual Information (MI), Principal Component Analysis (PCA), and Recursive Feature Elimination (RFE), were applied to optimize the feature set. Classifiers such as XGBoost, CatBoost, Random Forest, and a Voting Classifier were used to evaluate diagnostic performance. The dataset was divided into training (70%) and testing (30%) sets, and metrics such as accuracy, sensitivity, and AUC-ROC were used for evaluation.
resultsThe combined radiomic and deep feature approach consistently outperformed standalone methods. The Voting Classifier paired with MI achieved the highest performance, with a test accuracy of 95%, sensitivity of 94%, and AUC-ROC of 96%. The end-to-end model achieved competitive results with an accuracy of 93% and AUC-ROC of 94%. SHAP analysis and t-SNE visualizations confirmed the interpretability and robustness of the selected features.
conclusionsThis hybrid framework demonstrates the potential for integrating radiomic and deep features to enhance diagnostic performance for wrist and forearm fractures, providing a reliable and interpretable solution suitable for clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.