ArticleMalaria journal2025
Forecasting malaria cases using climate variability in Sierra Leone.
Article in Malaria journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recent advances in machine learning and Bayesian modeling for tropical disease prediction, diagnosis, and risk analysis: a scoping review.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Mapping malaria hotspots through spatial and spatio-temporal analysis in Sierra Leone, 2021-2024.Public health action · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMalaria continues to pose a public health challenge in Sierra Leone, where timely and accurate forecasting can guide more effective interventions. Although seasonal models such as Seasonal Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (SARIMA) have traditionally been employed for disease forecasting, Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) have gained attention for capturing complex temporal patterns that linear models may not fully capture.
methodsThis study compares the forecasting performance of SARIMA and ANN models in forecasting malaria cases using malaria case data from 2018 to 2023. A baseline SARIMA model was developed and improved with exogenous climatic variables (precipitation, maximum temperature, and mean relative humidity) to form a SARIMAX approach. In parallel, an ANN was trained solely on historical malaria cases, without adding climatic variables.
resultsSARIMA offered reasonable predictive capabilities but was outperformed by the ANN, which captured complex temporal patterns more effectively, decreasing forecast errors and improving its coefficient of determination
conclusionsThese findings underscore the ANN's ability to capture non-linear dynamics, even without explicit climate inputs. These results reinforce the value of machine learning modelling approaches in guiding malaria control strategies, particularly in high-burden settings like Sierra Leone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.