ArticleBMC public health2025
Smoking cessation message testing to inform app-based interventions for young adults - an online experiment.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- App-Based Smoking Urge Reduction Intervention for Young Adults: Protocol Combining a Microrandomized Trial and Conventional Between-Subject Randomized Trial.JMIR research protocols · 2025Article
- Micro-randomized pilot trial of an app-based smoking urge reduction intervention for young adults.mHealth · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTo improve the efficacy of digital smoking cessation interventions for young adults, intervention messages need to be acceptable and appropriate for this population. The current study compared ratings of smoking cessation and urge reduction messages based on Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (distraction themed) and Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (acceptance themed) in young adults who smoke.
methodsA total of 124 intervention messages were rated by an online Qualtrics panel of N = 301 diverse young adults who currently smoked tobacco cigarettes (Age M = 26.6 years; 54.8% male; 51.5% racial/ethnic minority; 16.9% sexual or gender minority (SGM); 62.5% daily smoking). Each participant rated 10 randomly selected messages (3,010 total message ratings; 24.3 ratings per message) on 5-point scales (higher scores representing more favorable ratings) evaluating quality of content, quality of design, perceived support for coping with smoking urges, and perceived support for quitting smoking. Mixed models examined associations between message category (distraction vs. acceptance), participant level predictors (sociodemographic variables, readiness and motivation to quit, daily smoking, psychological flexibility), and message ratings.
resultsOverall ratings ranged from M = 3.61 (SD = 1.25) on support for coping with urges to M = 3.90 (SD = 1.03) on content, with no differences between distraction and acceptance messages. Male participants gave more favorable ratings on the dimensions of support for coping (p < 0.01) and support for quitting (p < 0.01). Participants identifying as SGM gave lower ratings for message design (p < 0.05). Participants with a graduate degree gave higher ratings on support for coping with urges and support for quitting (both p < 0.05). Higher motivation to quit was associated with more favorable scores across all dimensions (all p < 0.01). Those smoking daily rated messages as less helpful for coping with urges (p < 0.01) and quitting smoking (p < 0.05) compared to those smoking non-daily. Few interactions were found between message category distraction vs. acceptance and participant characteristics.
conclusionsDistraction and acceptance messages received similar ratings among young adults who smoke cigarettes. Message revisions may be needed to increase appeal to women, SGM, those with lower education, and those less motivated to quit. Messages will be refined and used in an ongoing micro-randomized trial to investigate their real-time impact on smoking urges and behaviors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.