ArticleBMC primary care2025
In depth exploration of drivers of community health workers' performance in maternal and child health services: a multistakeholder perspective from rural Indian setting.
Article in BMC primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cancer screening uptake and tobacco-alcohol use among women in Uttarakhand: A district-wise analysis from the 5th National Family Health Survey (NFHS-5).The Indian journal of medical research · 2026Article
- Understanding the drivers of effective supportive supervision: a realist evaluation of community health worker programs in Madhya Pradesh, India.BMC health services research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCommunity health workers' (CHWs') performance may be affected by several factors interplaying at the systemic level. There is a need to study those factors in the indigenous context to devise strategies for optimising the CHWs' performance. Hence, this study was conducted to understand the individual, health system and community level drivers of CHWs performance in Maternal and Child Health services and to decipher the interactions between CHWs and their stakeholders. MATERIALS AND
methodsA qualitative inquiry using pragmatic philosophy in a rural setting of Central India (Madhya Pradesh) was conducted. Firstly, relatively low and high performing CHWs were identified, and their stakeholders were selected through purposive sampling. A total of twenty in-depth interviews of CHWs, including their stakeholders, and two focused group discussions with nineteen participants were conducted. Manual thematic analysis was used to summarise the drivers of CHWs' performance. The 4 Cs subjective realistic model was created. The 4Cs of the model stand for the context of the shared responsibility; the clashes experienced by the CHWs (while working with their peers), complications and subsequent coherent measures from the stakeholders' perspective.
resultsThe drivers of CHWs' performance were broadly constituted by three categories: contextual level, health system level and intrinsic contentment. The contextual factors include transport availability, community behaviour and heterogeneity in population. The determinants of health system were irregular incentives, scarcity of drugs, lack of peers' support, patronage and benefaction. The intrinsic contentment was represented with sense of lack of recognition, family issues and natural causes. As per the realistic model, the clashes were related to network and transport availability, concurrent surveys, irregular incentives and peer support. These clashes led to the incompletion of tasks by CHWs which further resulted in supervisory challenges for the peers. The coherent measures suggested includes strengthening of supportive supervision and availability of regular incentives and transport.
conclusionThe CHWs' performance was a derivation of inherent context, which was bidirectionally influenced by health systems concerns. The stakeholders' interviews led to in depth understanding of the challenges faced by CHWs thereby adding validity to the qualitative inquiry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.