ArticleBMC geriatrics2025
Stepping through fear: analysing postural control in elderly women during transitional locomotor tasks.
Article in BMC geriatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFear of falling (FoF) is prevalent among older adults, particularly women, and is a known factor increasing fall risk during movement. FoF may naturally arise after the first fall incident as well as long before the first fall occurs. This study examined how FoF intensity affects static balance and transitional locomotor tasks in 81 healthy women aged 60 and older.
methodsParticipants were divided into LOW, MODERATE, and HIGH FoF groups based on their Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I) scores. Static balance was measured by center of pressure velocity (vCOP), while transitional tasks were assessed through transit time (TT), double support period (DSP), and stability times (S1-the time needed to destabilize the body before taking a step and S2- the time required to stabilize the position after taking a step) under unimpeded transition on a flat surface, obstacle clearance, step-up, and step-down conditions.
resultsThe findings showed no significant differences in static balance (vCOP) across FoF groups. However, the HIGH FoF group took longer to complete transitional tasks, with significantly increased TT, DSP, and S1 compared to the MODERATE group, particularly during obstacle clearance and step-up/down movements. This suggests that individuals with higher FoF take a more cautious approach, prioritizing stability over speed. No significant differences in S2 were found, indicating that FoF does not affect balance recovery after a step.
conclusionThe study concludes that while FoF does not impair static balance, it significantly impacts movement initiation and execution in transitional tasks. Prolonged preparation time (S1) in the HIGH FoF group highlights the role of fear in delaying movement. These findings are important for designing interventions to reduce FoF and prevent falls in older adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.