ArticleMolecular imaging and biology2025
Visual and Quantitative
Article in Molecular imaging and biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe progression rate and course of radioiodine refractory differentiated thyroid cancer (RAIR-DTC) vary significantly, yet there lacks a precise method for predicting its progression. We hypothesized that using the liver as a reference organ can enable selective patient stratification. We aimed to establish fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography ([ PROCEDURES: This study included 64 patients with RAIR-DTC undergoing baseline
resultsAmong 64 patients, the distribution of high-TLR versus low-TLR groups varied across scoring methods: vTLR score allocated 36 (56.3%) high vs 28 (43.7%) low, qTLRmax score identified 29 (45.3%) high vs 35 (54.7%) low, and qTLRmean score demonstrated the most divergent pattern with 21 (32.8%) high vs 43 (67.2%) low. Agreement among qTLRmax, vTLR and qTLRmean score was moderate (Fleiss weighted k, 0.579). The median PFS of the high and low groups by vTLR score was 16.0, 29.0 months (P = 0.010) respectively, by qTLRmax score was 14.0, 27.0 months (P = 0.041), respectively, by qTLRmean score was 14.0, 28.0 months (P = 0.004), respectively.
conclusionsThe TLR score was prognostic for PFS of RAIR-DTC. The vTLR score assessed on 3D MIP PET images yielded substantial reproducibility and combining qTLR score provided reliable prognostic value.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40394424What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.