ArticleScientific reports2025
Intelligent health model for medical imaging to guide laymen using neural cellular automata.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A layman in health systems is a person who doesn't have any knowledge about health data i.e., X-ray, MRI, CT scan, and health examination reports, etc. The motivation behind the proposed invention is to help laymen to make medical images understandable. The health model is trained using a neural network approach that analyses user health examination data; predicts the type and level of the disease and advises precaution to the user. Cellular Automata (CA) technology has been integrated with the neural networks to segment the medical image. The CA analyzes the medical images pixel by pixel and generates a robust threshold value which helps to efficiently segment the image and identify accurate abnormal spots from the medical image. The proposed method has been trained and experimented using 10000+ medical images which are taken from various open datasets. Various text analysis measures i.e., BLEU, ROUGE, and WER are used in the research to validate the produced report. The BLEU and ROUGE calculate a similarity to decide how the generated text report is closer to the original report. The BLEU and ROUGE scores of the experimented images are approximately 0.62 and 0.90, claims that the produced report is very close to the original report. The WER score 0.14, claims that the generated report contains the most relevant words. The overall summary of the proposed research is that it provides a fruitful medical report with accurate disease and precautions to the laymen.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.