Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40394379›Full record

ArticleBJC reports2025

Single-cell analysis reveals tumour size as a key driver of immune cell profile alterations in primary breast tumours and corresponding lymph nodes.

Marit Otterlei Fjørtoft, Øystein Garred, Ole Christian Lingjærde, Karin Teien Lande, Lars Ottestad, Inger Riise Bergheim, OSBREAC, Jon Lømo, Colin LaMont, June Helen Myklebust and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJC reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Marit Otterlei FjørtoftDepartment of Cancer Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Øystein GarredDepartment of Pathology, Division of Laboratory Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Ole Christian LingjærdeDepartment of Cancer Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Karin Teien LandeDepartment of Cancer Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Lars OttestadDepartment of Cancer Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Inger Riise BergheimDepartment of Cancer Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
OSBREAC
Jon LømoDepartment of Pathology, Division of Laboratory Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Colin LaMontDepartment of Cancer Immunology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
June Helen MyklebustDepartment of Cancer Immunology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Hege RussnesDepartment of Cancer Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Kanutte Huse *Department of Cancer Immunology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Inga Hansine Rye *Department of Cancer Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway. ingrye@ous-hf.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0821-0585

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAt diagnosis, 30-40% of women with breast cancer have metastases in sentinel (SN) or axillary lymph nodes (ALN). Nodal status is a strong prognostic factor and guides treatment decisions. Immune checkpoint inhibition has shown some efficacy, which can increase in the neoadjuvant setting. A better understanding of how tumour cells in primary tumours and metastatic lymph nodes shape the local immune microenvironment may provide clues for more individualized therapeutic interventions.

methodsWe conducted deep immunophenotypic analysis of 29 primary breast tumours and 36 lymph nodes from 38 patients with primary operable breast cancer.

resultsThe immune profile of the primary tumour was not predictive of the lymph node immune profile or metastatic status. Primary tumours showed prominent CD8 T cell exhaustion and activated regulatory T cells, and the frequencies of these subsets were associated with tumour size. The immune cell profile in lymph nodes were different from the profile in primary tumours, except for the ALN+ nodes, which displayed a T-cell profile more similar to primary tumours. The frequencies of the T cell subsets in lymph nodeswere associated with metastatic size. Tumour cells from smaller metastases exhibited a distinct phenotype compared to those from larger tumour deposits, and the size of the tumour cell deposit impacted the local immune cell composition.

conclusionThe tumour size of primary tumours and metastatic size in lymph nodes are the main drivers of changes in immune cell composition.

Identifiers

PMID40394379
PMCPMC12092822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.