SynthesisLasers in medical science2025
Photobiomodulation effects on cognitive function - a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Synthesis in Lasers in medical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effects of whole-body vibration on cognitive function: a systematic review and meta-analysis.GeroScience · 2026Pooled it
- Non-invasive neuromodulation techniques for cognitive impairment intervention.American journal of translational research · 2026Review
- Effect of Femtosecond Laser Radiation on Cognitive Abilities in Mice.Doklady. Biochemistry and biophysics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Photobiomodulation can alleviate the severity or delay the development of cognitive impairment through early prevention and intervention. This systematic review summarizes the effectiveness of photobiomodulation in improving cognitive function across various populations. Clinical randomized controlled trials from the establishment of the database to October 2024 were searched in PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library according to PRISMA guidelines. Trials comparing the effects of PBM treatment with placebo or sham stimulation on cognitive function in healthy adults or subjects with cognitive impairment were included. Two independent researchers conducted literature screening, data extraction, and quality assessment of the included studies. Meta-analyses were performed using random effects models with Review Manager V.5.4 software. The methodological quality of the studies was evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Sensitivity analyses were performed using Stata V.15.1 software. A total of 24 randomized trials involving 820 participants met the inclusion criteria. Compared with the control group, PBM treatment showed significant benefits for subjects in terms of global cognitive function (SMD = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.23 to 1.08, P = 0.003), working memory span (SMD = 1.41, 95% CI: 0.78 to 2.04, P < 0.0001), attention (SMD = -1.15, 95% CI: -2.05 to -0.24, P = 0.01) and the reaction time of executive function (SMD = -1.10, 95% CI: -1.86 to -0.33, P = 0.005) aspects. In the subgroup analyses, with the exception of no differences in both reaction time of working memory and accuracy of executive function, cognitive impaired subjects showed some improvement in other all cognitive domains (attention test only for healthy subjects), while healthy subjects showed an insignificant improvement in reaction time of executive function. This meta-analysis found that PBM treatment positively impacts global cognitive function, working memory, and executive function in persons with cognitive impairment, and partially improved global cognitive function, working memory and attention in the healthy population. However, this finding should be treated with caution due to the heterogeneity and limitations of the studies. Registration number: CRD42024552832. Registration data: 2024/06/10.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40394373What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.