ArticleEvidence-based dentistry2025
Using flavour in your favour: does giving children an element of control help them engage more positively with the dental experience?
Article in Evidence-based dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
a commentary onKarim R, Splieth C H, Schmoeckel J. Effect of choice of flavour of fluoride varnish on behaviour in dental visits in schoolchildren. Clin Exp Dent Res. 2025; https://doi.org/10.1002/cre2.70069 .
aimTo assess the efficacy of giving children choice within the dental surgery to improve behaviour outcomes, investigated by letting them choose the flavour of fluoride varnish (FV). This single-blinded, randomised control trial recruited children attending the specialised paediatric dental service within the Greifswald University Hospital for a dental check-up and preventative FV application. Upon attendance, children were randomly assigned to one of two groups: the control group, where the flavour of FV was predetermined, or the test group, where the children selected their preferred flavour. A blinded observer used Frankl behaviour rating scale (FBRS) to assess behaviour during the appointment, and taste acceptance was assessed using the Facial image scale (FIS). CASE SELECTION: 70 participants were recruited at the time of their appointment. These were healthy (ASA I or ASA II) German children aged 5 to 10. Exclusion criteria included their first dental experience, experiencing dental pain or an allergy to FV. 35 children were randomly allocated to both groups.
resultsMost children, regardless of their allocation, were assessed as positive, or definitely positive according to FBRS (n = 58, 82.8%), though results on behaviour outcomes were statistically insignificant (p = 0.376). There were no significant differences between the control group or the test group on flavour ratings of the FV, with most children (n = 53, 75.7%) scoring happy, or very happy according to FIS. History of negative dental behaviour was also taken into consideration (n = 27), and whilst it appeared children with history of negative experience displayed more positive behaviour in the test group vs the control group (75% vs 54.5%), results were not statistically significant (p = 0.244).
conclusionThis study shows that allowing children a sense of control by permitting them to choose their flavour of FV may be a useful behaviour management tool, though the results are not statistically significant.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40394333What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.