ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026
Histopathology-Based Prostate Cancer Classification Using ResNet: A Comprehensive Deep Learning Analysis.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predicting Prostate Cancer Risk and Its Associated Factors Using Machine Learning Techniques: A Retrospective Study.Health science reports · 2026Article
- A Multi-Stage Hybrid Learning Model with Advanced Feature Fusion for Enhanced Prostate Cancer Classification.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Evaluation of Deep Learning Convolutional Neural Networks for Classification of Carcinoma Ex Pleomorphic Adenoma and Pleomorphic Adenoma in Whole-Slide Images.Head and neck pathology · 2025Article
- Transcriptomic and functional analysis of triphenyl phosphate exposure in prostate cancer progression.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prostate cancer is the most prevalent solid tumor in males and one of the most common causes of male mortality. It is the most common type of cancer in men, a major global public health issue, and accounts for up to 7.3% of all male cancer diagnoses worldwide. To optimize patient outcomes and ensure therapeutic success, an accurate diagnosis must be made promptly. To achieve this, we focused on using ResNet50, a convolutional neural network (CNN) architecture, to analyze prostate histological images to classify prostate cancer. ResNet50, due to its efficiency in medical image classification, was used to classify the histological images as benign or malignant. In this study, a total of 1276 prostate biopsy images were used on the ResNet50 model. We employed evaluation metrics such as accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score. The results showed that the ResNet50 model performed excellently with an overall accuracy of 0.98, 1.00 as precision, 0.98 as recall, and 0.97 as F1 score for benign. The malignant histological image has 0.99, 0.98, and 0.97 as precision, recall, and F1 scores. It also recorded a 95% confidence interval (CI) for accuracy as (0.91, 1.00) and a performance gain of 4.26% compared to MobileNet and CNN-RNN. The result of our model was also compared with the state-of-the-art (SOTA) DL models to ensure robustness. This study has demonstrated the potential of the ResNet50 model in the classification of prostate cancer. Again, the clinical integration of the results of this study will aid decision-makers in enhancing patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.