Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40394318›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026

Histopathology-Based Prostate Cancer Classification Using ResNet: A Comprehensive Deep Learning Analysis.

Declan Ikechukwu Emegano, Mubarak Taiwo Mustapha, Dilber Uzun Ozsahin, Ilker Ozsahin, Berna Uzun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Declan Ikechukwu EmeganoOperational Research Center in Healthcare, Near East University, Nicosia/TRNC, 99138, Mersin 10, Turkey. declanikechukwu.emegano@neu.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0258-9624
Mubarak Taiwo MustaphaOperational Research Center in Healthcare, Near East University, Nicosia/TRNC, 99138, Mersin 10, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5660-4581
Dilber Uzun OzsahinOperational Research Center in Healthcare, Near East University, Nicosia/TRNC, 99138, Mersin 10, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3873-1410
Ilker OzsahinOperational Research Center in Healthcare, Near East University, Nicosia/TRNC, 99138, Mersin 10, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3141-6805
Berna UzunOperational Research Center in Healthcare, Near East University, Nicosia/TRNC, 99138, Mersin 10, Turkey. berna.uzun@neu.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5438-8608

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prostate cancer is the most prevalent solid tumor in males and one of the most common causes of male mortality. It is the most common type of cancer in men, a major global public health issue, and accounts for up to 7.3% of all male cancer diagnoses worldwide. To optimize patient outcomes and ensure therapeutic success, an accurate diagnosis must be made promptly. To achieve this, we focused on using ResNet50, a convolutional neural network (CNN) architecture, to analyze prostate histological images to classify prostate cancer. ResNet50, due to its efficiency in medical image classification, was used to classify the histological images as benign or malignant. In this study, a total of 1276 prostate biopsy images were used on the ResNet50 model. We employed evaluation metrics such as accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score. The results showed that the ResNet50 model performed excellently with an overall accuracy of 0.98, 1.00 as precision, 0.98 as recall, and 0.97 as F1 score for benign. The malignant histological image has 0.99, 0.98, and 0.97 as precision, recall, and F1 scores. It also recorded a 95% confidence interval (CI) for accuracy as (0.91, 1.00) and a performance gain of 4.26% compared to MobileNet and CNN-RNN. The result of our model was also compared with the state-of-the-art (SOTA) DL models to ensure robustness. This study has demonstrated the potential of the ResNet50 model in the classification of prostate cancer. Again, the clinical integration of the results of this study will aid decision-makers in enhancing patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Deep LearningImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedProstatic NeoplasmsHumansMaleNeural Networks, ComputerBenignBiopsyHistologicalMalignantProstate cancerResNet50

Identifiers

PMID40394318
PMCPMC12921011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.