Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40394282›Full record

SynthesisMolecular psychiatry2025

Cholinergic system in schizophrenia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Zacharie Saint-Georges, Julia MacDonald, Roya Al-Khalili, Rami Hamati, Marco Solmi, Matcheri S Keshavan, Lauri Tuominen, Synthia Guimond

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Molecular psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Lower Muscarinic MBiological psychiatry · 2026
    Article
  10. Natural Molecules for Brain Health and Resilience.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Zacharie Saint-GeorgesThe University of Ottawa Institute of Mental Health Research at the Royal, Ottawa, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8709-4403
Julia MacDonaldDepartment of Neuroscience, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Roya Al-KhaliliThe University of Ottawa Institute of Mental Health Research at the Royal, Ottawa, ON, Canada.ORCID 0009-0007-4843-0025
Rami HamatiThe University of Ottawa Institute of Mental Health Research at the Royal, Ottawa, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7213-9253
Marco SolmiThe Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4877-7233
Matcheri S KeshavanDepartment of Psychiatry, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Lauri Tuominen *The University of Ottawa Institute of Mental Health Research at the Royal, Ottawa, ON, Canada. tuominenlj@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-8726-0467
Synthia Guimond *The University of Ottawa Institute of Mental Health Research at the Royal, Ottawa, ON, Canada. synthia.guimond@uqo.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-1582-725X

Funding

Gouvernement du Canada | Canadian Institutes of Health Research (Instituts de Recherche en Santé du Canada) 173227
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesStudies have shown widespread alterations in different components of the cholinergic system in schizophrenia, but to date the evidence has not been systematically reviewed and summarized. Here, we systematically review imaging and post-mortem studies on the central cholinergic system in schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorder. SUBJECTS/

methodsSearches were performed in Embase and Medline. Study designs included cross-sectional case control studies comparing individuals with schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorder to control population. Risk of bias was assessed with the NIH/NHLBI tool for Quality Assessment of Case-Control Studies. The current study followed the PRISMA 2020 guidelines (PROSPERO: CRD42023402126).

resultsA total of 3259 studies were screened and 61 met eligibility criteria for the systematic review, including 8 in vivo neuroimaging and 53 post-mortem studies. About 74% of these studies described significant alterations, most often reductions in either muscarinic or nicotinic receptor levels in schizophrenia. We also conducted 3 meta-analyses showing reductions in M1/M4 muscarinic receptors in the striatum (g = -0.809, k = 3, n = 108), hippocampus (g = -0.872, k = 3, n = 84), and fronto-cingulate cortex (g = -0.438, k = 4, n = 295). Six neuroimaging studies reported associations with clinical symptom severity measures, and four investigations with cognitive dysfunction.

conclusionsOur review demonstrates a widespread decrease in muscarinic and nicotinic receptor levels in schizophrenia, evident in both neuroimaging and post-mortem studies. Our meta-analyses show large to moderate effects for the reductions in M1/M4 muscarinic receptors in the striatum, hippocampus, and fronto-cingulate cortex. Limitations and future directions for the field are discussed.

Indexed as

SchizophreniaBrainCase-Control StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesHippocampusHumansNeuroimagingPsychotic DisordersReceptors, MuscarinicReceptors, NicotinicReceptors, MuscarinicReceptors, Nicotinic

Identifiers

PMID40394282
PMCPMC12185319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.