ReviewCurrent pain and headache reports2025
The Application of Artificial Intelligence to Enhance Spinal Cord Stimulation Efficacy for Chronic Pain Management: Current Evidence and Future Directions.
Review in Current pain and headache reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Digital Transformation of Rehabilitation Medicine: A Narrative Review of Artificial Intelligence Innovations, Clinical Integration, and Future Paradigms.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2026Review
- State of the Art in Neuromodulation or Spinal Cord Stimulation Therapy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Molecular and Cellular Mechanisms of Spinal Cord Stimulation: Linking Dorsal Horn Circuits, Glia, and ECAP-Guided Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- From the Pain Matrix to Functional Networks: A Narrative Review of Chronic Pain Mechanisms Across Adult and Pediatric Populations with Emerging AI Perspectives.Brain sciences · 2026Review
- Stroke Rehabilitation, Novel Technology and the Internet of Medical Things.Brain sciences · 2026Review
- Leveraging artificial intelligence to optimize neuromodulation in the treatment of patients with chronic pain.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence and Connected Technologies in Chronic Pain Management: A Scoping Review.Pain research & management · 2026Article
- Beyond device parameters: psychological predictors of spinal cord stimulation success and their neurobiological mechanisms-a narrative review.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Review
- General Innovations in Pain Management.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewChronic pain significantly impacts quality of life for millions globally, with spinal cord stimulation (SCS) as an established treatment for refractory chronic pain. However, traditional SCS therapies face limitations including inconsistent patient outcomes, challenges in patient selection, and difficulties in sustaining therapeutic efficacy. This review examines how artificial intelligence (AI) can enhance the efficacy and personalization of SCS therapy by optimizing patient selection, refining stimulation parameters, and enabling real-time adaptive adjustments. RECENT
findingsRecent advances demonstrate that integrating AI with SCS significantly improves patient outcomes through predictive modeling for patient selection and real-time adaptive stimulation. Predictive analytics utilizing machine learning algorithms have successfully identified patient cohorts most likely to benefit from SCS therapy, enhancing response rates and reducing suboptimal outcomes. Closed-loop AI systems incorporating physiological feedback, such as evoked compound action potentials (ECAPs), dynamically optimize stimulation parameters, resulting in sustained pain relief, decreased programming burden, and improved device longevity. Despite these promising results, critical challenges persist, particularly related to data standardization, ethical considerations, and regulatory compliance. AI holds transformative potential for spinal cord stimulation, offering increased precision, personalization, and therapeutic efficiency in managing chronic pain. Although early results are encouraging, comprehensive clinical validation and multidisciplinary collaboration remain essential. Addressing ethical, regulatory, and data management challenges will be critical for widespread adoption of AI-enhanced SCS therapies in routine clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40394275What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.