ArticleAmerican journal of epidemiology2026
The association between smoking status and aging cognitive trajectory accounting for bias in attrition.
Article in American journal of epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Smoking hot joint models for attrition bias-XMAR-ks the spot.American journal of epidemiology · 2026Article
- Article
- The Influence of Lifestyle on Cognitive Function and Quality of Life in People with Dementia.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Studies on the relationship between smoking and cognition yield conflicting results, potentially from survival bias. We examined the effect of smoking status on cognitive evolution, accounting for potential bias in attrition. We analyzed 21 216 Black and White participants from the REGARDS cohort study. In order to account for potential differential attrition, a sensitivity analysis compared the association between smoking status and age-sex-specific composite cognitive trajectories using linear mixed models, robust under missing at random assumption, and joint models, robust under the extended missing at random assumptions. Linear mixed model results indicated current smokers had lower overall composite cognitive scores compared to never smokers at baseline (-0.20, 95% CI, -0.23 to -0.16) and at 14-years duration in the study (-0.26, 95% CI, -0.33 to -0.20), also apparent when comparing current smokers to past smokers, and memory and verbal fluency composite scores. Joint modeling estimates yielded results similar to results from linear mixed models. Joint models are recommended as a potential means to investigate concerns about attrition, particularly in studies of factors associated with both cognition and mortality. This study provides further support that smoking is likely to have negative impacts on cognition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.