Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40394207›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Temporal changes in the bacterial microbiome of the salivary gland and midgut tissues of Rhipicephalus sanguineus (s.l.) ticks in South Africa.

Rebecca E Ackermann, Cory A Gall, Kelly A Brayton, Nicola E Collins, Ilana van Wyk, Jeanette Wentzel, Agatha O Kolo, Marinda C Oosthuizen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Rebecca E AckermannDepartment of Veterinary Tropical Diseases, University of Pretoria, Onderstepoort, South Africa. beccy7.ra@gmail.com.
Cory A GallDepartment of Veterinary Tropical Diseases, University of Pretoria, Onderstepoort, South Africa.
Kelly A BraytonDepartment of Veterinary Tropical Diseases, University of Pretoria, Onderstepoort, South Africa.
Nicola E CollinsDepartment of Veterinary Tropical Diseases, University of Pretoria, Onderstepoort, South Africa.
Ilana van WykHans Hoheisen Research Centre, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Pretoria, Hoedspruit, South Africa.
Jeanette WentzelDepartment of Veterinary Tropical Diseases, University of Pretoria, Onderstepoort, South Africa.
Agatha O KoloDepartment of Veterinary Tropical Diseases, University of Pretoria, Onderstepoort, South Africa.
Marinda C OosthuizenDepartment of Veterinary Tropical Diseases, University of Pretoria, Onderstepoort, South Africa.

Funding

Zoonotic tick-borne pathogens contribute to acute febrile illness in rural South AfricaR01AI136832 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PRETORIA · PI OOSTHUIZEN, MARINDA CATHARINA · 2019 to 2023
$704k
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases of the National Institutes of Health R01AI136832NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI136832South African National Research Foundation 92739
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tick-borne bacterial pathogens from animals play a significant role in the (re)emergence of human diseases. Rhipicephalus sanguineus sensu lato, a globally prevalent tick, predominantly parasitises domestic dogs but can also feed on humans. We characterised temporal changes in the bacterial microbiome of the midgut and salivary gland tissues of R. sanguineus s.l. ticks and analysed their potential as reservoirs for pathogenic bacteria. A 16 S microbiome and amplicon sequence variant (ASV) approach was used to study the bacteria present in the tissues of R. sanguineus s.l. ticks collected from dogs in Hluvukani, a village in a rural community in Bushbuckridge, Mpumalanga, South Africa, in 2016, 2017 and 2019. Post processing, we obtained 43,161 total sequence reads which were clustered into ASVs by sample year. The final ASVs dataset consisted of seven genera: Coxiella, Anaplasma, Escherichia/Shigella, Ehrlichia, Borrelia, Rickettsia and Wolbachia. No differences in the microbiome profiles of the MG and SG tissues were noted. Coxiella endosymbionts dominated the microbiome in all years. Anaplasma was first detected in 2017, and an increase in Anaplasma levels was detected in 2019, when compared to 2017. All other genera were present at low levels. With the exclusion of Wolbachia, the other detected genera could have pathogenic potential, highlighting the role that R. sanguineus s.l. might play as a reservoir of pathogens.

Indexed as

BacteriaGastrointestinal MicrobiomeMicrobiotaRhipicephalus sanguineusSalivary GlandsAnaplasmaAnimalsDogsRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSouth AfricaRNA, Ribosomal, 16S16S rRNAAmplicon sequence variantsAnaplasmaBacterial microbiomeCoxiellaDog

Identifiers

PMID40394207
PMCPMC12092631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.