ArticleNature ecology & evolution2025
The pan-tropical age distribution of regenerating tropical moist forest.
Article in Nature ecology & evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Species mixing promotes plant biomass accumulation and nutrient cycling in forest plantations.Communications biology · 2026Pooled it
- Biodiversity resilience in a tropical rainforest.Nature · 2026Article
- Long-term recovery of canopy 3D structural diversity following wildfires in the world's largest temperate woodland.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2025Article
- A unifying framework for understanding how edge effects reshape the structure, composition and function of forests.The New phytologist · 2025Review
- Young regrowth forests are worth saving.Nature ecology & evolution · 2025Article
- The pan-tropical age distribution of regenerating tropical moist forest.Nature ecology & evolution · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Natural forest regeneration in the tropics is a key element of restoration pledges. Protecting older regenerating forests that already hold substantial carbon and biodiversity value, while promoting natural regeneration in young secondary forests in regions where forests are likely to persist long term, is vital for effective forest restoration. Key questions therefore include understanding the age distribution of naturally regenerating forests pan-tropically and which environmental or socio-economic conditions predict increased longevity in regenerating forests. Here, using a time series of forest cover data (1990-2023) to map the age of regenerating tropical moist forests, we identify 51 Mha of regenerating tropical moist forest, of which >50% is ≤5 years old and under high deforestation pressure, whereas only 6% (3 Mha) is ≥20 years old and located predominantly in the tropical Americas. Location and forest characteristics in the surrounding landscape best predict the age of regenerating forests, with older forests located in areas with high forest integrity and extent, and low forest loss. Realizing the environmental and social values of naturally regenerating forests requires urgent financial, political and societal mechanisms to facilitate the long-term persistence of restoration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.