Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40394195›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

A study of scheduling strategies for microgrids based on the non-dominated sorting dung beetle optimization algorithm.

Yutong Chen, Wu Ning, Wei Du

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yutong ChenDepartment of Electronic and Information Engineering, Liaoning University of Technology, Jinzhou, 121001, China.
Wu NingDepartment of Electronic and Information Engineering, Liaoning University of Technology, Jinzhou, 121001, China. jsknw@qq.com.
Wei DuDepartment of Electronic and Information Engineering, Liaoning University of Technology, Jinzhou, 121001, China.

Funding

Foundation for Innovative Research Groups of the National Natural Science Foundation of China U24A20283Liaoning Provincial Department of Education LJKFZ20220238
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microgrids possess robust self-operation and management capabilities, enabling effective utilization of renewable energy sources and enhancing the reliability and security of power supply within power systems. However, challenges such as low economic benefits and inefficient operation have long plagued microgrids. To address these issues, this paper presents a microgrid scheduling strategy based on the Non-Dominated Sorting Dung Beetle Optimization Algorithm (NSDBO). By incorporating the non-dominated sorting mechanism into the dung beetle optimization algorithm, the solution set is divided into different tiers. Solutions within each tier demonstrate superior performance compared to those in other tiers. Moreover, when tackling multi-objective optimization problems, this approach effectively avoids falling into local optima and significantly enhances the algorithm's global search capability. Experimental results reveal that, in comparison to other algorithms, the proposed NSDBO algorithm outperforms them in terms of hypervolume (HV) and generational distance (GD), indicating its advantages in both convergence and diversity. Specifically, compared with the Grey Wolf Optimizer (GWO) and the standard Dung Beetle Optimization (DBO) algorithm, the overall operation cost of NSDBO is reduced by 52% and 8.1%, respectively. These findings fully demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm in improving users' economic benefits and reducing environmental pollution.

Indexed as

Dung beetle algorithmMicrogrid scheduling strategyNon-dominated sortingOverall operating cost

Identifiers

PMID40394195
PMCPMC12092632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.