ArticleScientific reports2025
Exploring agglomeration of respirable silica and other particles in coal mine dust.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A better understanding of respirable dust particle characteristics is needed to advance exposure monitoring and prevent health effects. In coal mines and other occupational environments, understanding respirable silica is especially important. Scanning electron microscopy with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM-EDX) enables particle-level dust analysis, but interpretation of data can be challenging when samples include agglomerated particles (i.e., particulates consisting of multiple independent particles attached together). On the other hand, a failure to recognize agglomerates or account for them in analysis risks oversimplification in exposure assessment. This research explores possible effects of agglomerates on respirable coal mine dust classification by SEM-EDX, with a specific focus on silica. Analysis was conducted both on respirable samples (collected with a typical apparatus including a cyclone size selector) and on respirable-sized particulates identified in passive samples. Results demonstrate that silica is often contained in respirable-sized agglomerates, though the typical respirable sampling apparatus appears to break up some of those agglomerates. For agglomerates that do persist, they may influence SEM-EDX results-possibly increasing apparent size distributions and/or "hiding" some of their constituents, including silica.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.