ArticleBJC reports2025
Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: analysis of post-treatment radiology and explant histology.
Article in BJC reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundStereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) has emerged as a new treatment modality for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Evaluation of tumour responses following SABR are currently based on conventional radiological criteria used for locoregional therapies. Whether these criteria accurately reflect tumour responses following SABR remains unknown. In this study, we provide a direct comparison of post-SABR radiological evaluation and explant histology for patients with HCC who underwent bridging SABR prior to liver transplantation.
methodsPatients with HCC who received SABR as bridging therapy prior to liver transplantation (January 2016-December 2022) in a large UK liver transplant centre were included. Post-SABR imaging was reported by two specialist hepato-pancreato-biliary radiologists, and histological examination of the explanted liver was performed by experienced liver histopathologists.
resultsSix patients with residual active HCC received SABR as bridging therapy prior to undergoing liver transplantation in our cohort. Of five patients with viable HCC detected on explant histology, recent radiological evaluation using LI-RADS treatment response criteria had suggested no evidence of residual active HCC for three patients, difficulty delineating residual disease from post-radiotherapy changes for one patient, and accurately identified viable tumour in one patient.
conclusionIn our case series conventional radiological criteria underestimated HCC tumour viability following SABR compared to explant histology. As the role for SABR expands in the management of HCC, caution is needed with radiological interpretation of HCC responses to radiotherapy using standard LI-RADS criteria. Prospective study in a larger cohort is required to identify radiological criteria capable of more conclusively evaluating HCC responses to SABR.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.