Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40394133›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2025

Influence of internal limiting membrane peeling during idiopathic epiretinal membrane removal: a randomized controlled trial.

Bo Hee Kim, Chang Ki Yoon, Kunho Bae, Eun Kyoung Lee, Chan Ho Lee, Dong Ik Kim, Ki Woong Bae, Un Chul Park

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Application of digital surgery in ophthalmology: intraoperative display of pre-operative enface OCT and ERM peeling unveiling the role of ERM adherence.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Bo Hee KimDepartment of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Chang Ki YoonDepartment of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Kunho BaeDepartment of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Eun Kyoung LeeDepartment of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Chan Ho LeeDepartment of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Dong Ik KimDepartment of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Ki Woong BaeDepartment of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Un Chul ParkDepartment of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. ucpark@snu.ac.kr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In epiretinal membrane (ERM) surgery, the influence of internal limiting membrane (ILM) integrity after ERM removal is underexplored. This study investigated outcomes of idiopathic ERM surgery based on ILM condition following ERM removal and intentional peeling of residual ILM. In this prospective, randomized clinical trial, 102 patients underwent vitrectomy for idiopathic ERM. After ERM removal, ILM status was evaluated using indocyanine green staining. Patients with mostly removed ILM were allocated to group 1 (involuntary peeling), whereas those with partially removed or intact ILM were randomized 1:1 to active peeling (group 2) or non-peeling of residual ILM (group 3). Recurrence of ERM during 12-month follow-up occurred only in group 3 (36.1%), particularly when residual ILM involved the fovea. Best-corrected visual acuity, metamorphopsia, and aniseikonia did not differ among groups; however, group 3 showed significantly lower central macular thickness at all follow-ups (p < 0.05) and better macular contour restoration according to retinal thickness profiles. In patients whose residual ILM involved the fovea, non-peeling resulted in less severe vertical metamorphopsia when ERM did not recur. These findings suggest that residual ILM peeling decisions during ERM surgery should consider both anatomical and functional outcomes, as non-peeling favoring anatomical macular recovery but increasing recurrence risk.

Indexed as

Basement MembraneEpiretinal MembraneVitrectomyAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesTomography, Optical CoherenceTreatment OutcomeVisual AcuityEpiretinal membraneInternal limiting membraneMetamorphopsiaRecurrence

Identifiers

PMID40394133
PMCPMC12092785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.