ArticleNPJ digital medicine2025
A randomized controlled trial of a digital lifestyle intervention involving postoperative patients with colorectal cancer.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effect of Digital Health Interventions on the Nutritional Status and Quality of Life of Patients With Colorectal Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Effects of digital health interventions on self-care and quality of life in patients with an ostomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2026Review
- APIM-guided dyadic nursing after colorectal cancer surgery: a propensity score-matched cohort study.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Deep multimodal fusion of patho-radiomic and clinical data for enhanced survival prediction for colorectal cancer patients.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Continuous Wearable-Sensor Monitoring After Colorectal Surgery: A Systematic Review of Clinical Outcomes and Predictive Analytics.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Few studies have investigated quality of life (QoL) improvements in patients with colorectal cancer or the benefits of digital healthcare interventions. This randomized controlled trial assessed the impact of mobile applications on postoperative QoL in patients scheduled for curative surgery for colorectal cancer. Patients were randomized into three intervention groups (each using a different mobile application for postoperative lifestyle management) and a control group. QoL was evaluated using the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D), with physical and metabolic parameters and fat/muscle areas measured preoperatively, and every six months postoperatively. At six months, no significant differences in the EQ-5D scores from baseline were observed across groups. Intervention Group C showed a significant increase in skeletal muscle area compared to the control group (P = 0.046). Overall, mobile application use had a minimal effect on postoperative health-related QoL, warranting further research on their efficacy and compliance rates. Trial registration: CRIS.nih.go.kr: KCT0005447. Registration date: June 23, 2020.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.