ArticleScientific reports2025
Cost optimization for flexible pavement on fine sand improved using palm fibers.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Improving the CBR value of the fine sand sub-soil layer is critical for enhancing flexible pavement roads' stability and cost efficiency. This study investigates the impact of mixing fine sand with palm fibers on its CBR value in order to minimize the total cost. Experimental tests were conducted considering different palm fiber contents (0.5%, 1.0%, and 1.5% by weight), and the results indicate that the maximum CBR value of 25% was archived using palm fiber content of 1.0%. Beyond this content, a decline in CBR was noted due to fiber clustering. The AASHTO Pavement Design Guide was used to investigate the impact of enhancing the sub-soil CBR value on the thickness and the cost of the base and sub-base layers for both urban and rural roads. The results showed that increasing the CBR value reduces both the thickness and the costs of these layers. In addition, the option of using a sub-base layer is more cost effective for rural roads on weak soil (CBR < 20%) and for high-traffic urban roads. Finally, a cost analysis study was conducted to optimize the total cost of soil improvement and (base & sub-base) layers. The outcomes indicated that the cost-effective CBR values are ranged between (13% & 17%) for rural roads and (17% and 19%) for urban roads. These values are equivalent to palm fiber content of (0.17% & 0.33%) for rural roads and (0.33% & 0.43%) for urban roads. Although this study showed that using organic reinforcement like palm fibers is a sustainable, economical, and eco-friendly solution, its durability and environmental degradation should be investigated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.