Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40394112›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

An explainable AI-driven deep neural network for accurate breast cancer detection from histopathological and ultrasound images.

Md Romzan Alom, Fahmid Al Farid, Muhammad Aminur Rahaman, Anichur Rahman, Tanoy Debnath, Abu Saleh Musa Miah, Sarina Mansor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Md Romzan AlomDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Green University of Bangladesh (GUB), Purbachal American City, Kanchon, Dhaka, 1460, Bangladesh.
Fahmid Al FaridFaculty of Artificial Intelligence and Engineering, Multimedia University, 63100, Cyberjaya, Malaysia.
Muhammad Aminur RahamanDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Green University of Bangladesh (GUB), Purbachal American City, Kanchon, Dhaka, 1460, Bangladesh. aminur@cse.green.edu.bd.
Anichur RahmanDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, National Institute of Textile Engineering and Research (NITER), Constituent Institute of the University of Dhaka, Savar, Dhaka, 1350, Bangladesh. anis_cse@niter.edu.bd.
Tanoy DebnathDepartment of Computer Science, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.
Abu Saleh Musa MiahDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Bangladesh Army University of Science and Technology (BAUST), Nilphamari, Bangladesh.
Sarina MansorFaculty of Artificial Intelligence and Engineering, Multimedia University, 63100, Cyberjaya, Malaysia. sarina.mansor@mmu.edu.my.

Funding

Multimedia University PostDoc(MMUI/240029)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer represents a significant global health challenge, which makes it essential to detect breast cancer early and accurately to improve patient prognosis and reduce mortality rates. However, traditional diagnostic processes relying on manual analysis of medical images are inherently complex and subject to variability between observers, highlighting the urgent need for robust automated breast cancer detection systems. While deep learning has demonstrated potential, many current models struggle with limited accuracy and lack of interpretability. This research introduces the Deep Neural Breast Cancer Detection (DNBCD) model, an explainable AI-based framework that utilizes deep learning methods for classifying breast cancer using histopathological and ultrasound images. The proposed model employs Densenet121 as a foundation, integrating customized Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) layers including GlobalAveragePooling2D, Dense, and Dropout layers along with transfer learning to achieve both high accuracy and interpretability for breast cancer diagnosis. The proposed DNBCD model integrates several preprocessing techniques, including image normalization and resizing, and augmentation techniques to enhance the model's robustness and address class imbalances using class weight. It employs Grad-CAM (Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping) to offer visual justifications for its predictions, increasing trust and transparency among healthcare providers. The model was assessed using two benchmark datasets: Breakhis-400x (B-400x) and Breast Ultrasound Images Dataset (BUSI) containing 1820 and 1578 images, respectively. We systematically divided the datasets into training (70%), testing (20%,) and validation (10%) sets, ensuring efficient model training and evaluation obtaining accuracies of 93.97% for B-400x dataset having benign and malignant classes and 89.87% for BUSI dataset having benign, malignant, and normal classes for breast cancer detection. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed DNBCD model significantly outperforms existing state-of-the-art approaches with potential uses in clinical environments. We also made all the materials publicly accessible for the research community at: https://github.com/romzanalom/XAI-Based-Deep-Neural-Breast-Cancer-Detection .

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsDeep LearningNeural Networks, ComputerUltrasonography, MammaryFemaleHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedImage Processing, Computer-AssistedUltrasonographyBreakhis-400xBreast cancerBUSICNNDNBCDGrad-CAMTransfer learningXAI

Identifiers

PMID40394112
PMCPMC12092800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.