ArticleScientific reports2025
Nationwide longitudinal study reveals impact of both national restriction levels and genetic risk factors on loneliness during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The impact of social restrictions during the COVID-19 pandemic on social isolation and loneliness has been widely debated, yet little attention has been given to identifying particularly vulnerable groups. In this study, we analysed data from 8,042 participants of the Danish Blood Donor Study (DBDS) through a prospective design with multiple follow-ups, integrating genetic, health, and socioeconomic information to identify distinct loneliness trajectories during the pandemic. Using the 3-item UCLA Loneliness Scale (UCLA-3), we found that self-reported loneliness increased in parallel with social restriction index, with women being particularly affected. We identified three distinct loneliness trajectories: high loneliness, pandemic loneliness, and low loneliness. Individuals in the high and pandemic loneliness trajectories both had higher polygenic scores (PGS) for loneliness and for the personality trait neuroticism compared to the low loneliness trajectory. The high loneliness trajectory was additionally associated with high PGS for psychiatric disorders and low PGS for the personality trait extraversion in addition to a higher proportion of pre-pandemic psychiatric disorder diagnoses. In contrast, the pandemic loneliness trajectory was linked to low PGS for the personality traits agreeableness and conscientiousness, as well as higher PGS for religious participation. These findings highlight the need for tailored interventions targeting individuals with poor mental well-being.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.