ArticleScientific reports2025
Construction of the risk prediction model of the alveolar antral artery as the intrasinusidal type at the point of UL6.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to identify predictors of intrasinusidal alveolar antral artery (AAA) localization at the upper left first molar (UL6) region and develop a clinical risk prediction model. A retrospective analysis of 243 eligible cases with cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging was conducted, categorizing AAA into intrasinusidal and non-intrasinusidal groups. Multivariable logistic regression revealed three independent predictors: anatomical variations (OR = 0.270, 95% CI 0.102-0.716), lateral Maxillary sinus wall width (OR = 0.583, 95% CI 0.371-0.915), and sinus cavity width (OR = 1.176, 95% CI 1.063-1.302). The nomogram-based prediction model demonstrated moderate discriminative capacity (C-index = 0.758) with satisfactory calibration alignment between predicted and observed outcomes. Receiver operating characteristic analysis yielded an area under the curve of 0.758. The sensitivity and specificity of the model were 0.789 and 0.579, respectively, with an accuracy of 69.0%.The findings demonstrate that when AAA is not visualized on CBCT scans, application of this model to assess the risk of intrasinusidal AAA occurrence in the surgical area enables preoperative planning of the surgical approach, thereby enhancing procedural safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.