Observational studyScientific reports2025
Medication versus globus pallidus internus deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease with deep learning video analysis of finger tapping.
Observational study in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In advanced Parkinson's disease (PD), considerable number of patients receive deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery, to alleviate symptoms not readily controlled by medication. However, the differential effects of medication and DBS on improving motor symptoms, especially for DBS targeting the globus pallidus internus (GPi), have not been explored in sufficient detail. We studied the finger tapping (FT) task of the Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part 3, to evaluate the improvements in bradykinesia achieved through GPi DBS in patients with PD. In this observational study, videos were recorded during the FT task in four different states for each patient, without and with medication in the preoperative setting, and before and after DBS programming in the postoperative setting. Using a deep learning model, we reconstructed the 2D hand motions into 3D meshes to extract 21 motion parameters that characterize hand bradykinesia. We employed these parameters to predict the FT score using machine learning models. Finally, statistical tests were used to compare motion parameters across four distinct states. A total of 556 videos from 87 patients were collected. The best model predicted the FT score with an accuracy of 0.70, which was on par with human experts. Notably, GPi DBS significantly improved speed and acceleration parameters compared to medication. Our study results indicate that GPi DBS and medication might act through different mechanisms, with GPi DBS more directly influencing neural pathways related to speed control in fine rhythmic hand movements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.