Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40393787›Full record

ReviewBMJ quality & safety2025

Time to de-implementation of low-value cancer screening practices: a narrative review.

Jennifer H LeLaurin, Kathryn Pluta, Wynne E Norton, Ramzi G Salloum, Naykky Singh Ospina

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ quality & safety, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jennifer H LeLaurinDepartment of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA jlelaurin@ufl.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5615-723X
Kathryn PlutaDepartment of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Wynne E NortonDivision of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Ramzi G SalloumDepartment of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Naykky Singh OspinaDivision of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7229-5061

Funding

Adequate selection of patients for thyroid biopsy: evaluation of a shared decision making conversation aidK08CA248972 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI SINGH OSPINA, NAYKKY · 2020 to 2024
$1.1M
NCI NIH HHS K08 CA248972
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The continued use of low-value cancer screening practices not only represents healthcare waste but also a potential cascade of invasive diagnostic procedures and patient anxiety and distress. While prior research has shown it takes an average of 15 years to implement evidence-based practices in cancer control, little is known about how long it takes to de-implement low-value cancer screening practices. We reviewed evidence on six United States Preventive Services Task Force 'Grade D' cancer screening practices: (1) cervical cancer screening in women<21 years and >65 years, (2) prostate cancer screening in men≥70 years and (3) ovarian, (4) thyroid, (5) testicular and (6) pancreatic cancer screening in asymptomatic adults. We measured the time from a landmark publication supporting the guideline publication and subsequent de-implementation, defined as a 50% reduction in the use of the practice in routine care. The pace of de-implementation was assessed using nationally representative surveillance systems and peer-reviewed literature from the USA. We found the time to de-implementation of cervical cancer screening was 4 years for women<21 and 16 years for women>65. Prostate screening in men ≥70 has not reached a 50% reduction in use since the 2012 guideline release. We did not identify sufficient evidence to measure the time to de-implementation for ovarian, thyroid, testicular and pancreatic cancer screening in asymptomatic adults. Surveillance of low-value cancer screening is sparse, posing a clear barrier to tracking the de-implementation of these screening practices. Improving the systematic measurement of low-value cancer control practices is imperative for assessing the impact of de-implementation on patient outcomes, healthcare delivery and healthcare costs.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerNeoplasmsAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTime FactorsUnited StatesImplementation scienceQuality measurementStandards of care

Identifiers

PMID40393787
PMCPMC12322393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.